kammiemc
New Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2015
- Messages
- 2,625
- Reaction score
- 20
Um does this work in May went it's warm outside? It's not like this happened in the winter. It was 78 degrees that day.
Yet another good point. I dunno!
Um does this work in May went it's warm outside? It's not like this happened in the winter. It was 78 degrees that day.
It always comes back to the red bag
The black back pack was a Herschel. And, indeed they use a lot of red in their lining. (Below is a pic from a quick image search.) I know that in the transcript Owens said that JW referred to his bag as a red bag, but in the affidavit it was said that it was red-lined, and Owens didn't seem totally straight on the facts in the affidavit. I think the black Herschel back pack could very well be the elusive red bag!View attachment 79409 ETA: The return didn't say that the black bag had red lining. That was just our own sleuthing to find out that Herschels often have red lining.
Great find! And I agree with you about the Herschel red lining - fits the bill.
Yeah, this does get frustrating, a backpack with red lining would make absolutely sense for both the picture sent and the fact that LE didn't find a redlined bag if they don't equate a backpack with being a bag. *sigh*. Sure looking forward to learning more facts, although it appears that facts can be interpreted by the Person-1 giving them, Person-2 hearing or reading them, Person-2 relating their understanding to Person-3, and so on.
It's so easy to misunderstand things on so many levels, especially for this. This concept would make a great game - how many ways can a (seemingly) simple description be interpreted? Is there such a game already out there? ddsmile:
grrr.
My ODD SIL (Oppositional Defiance Disorder, but ODD is so, so perfect) would say: "Of course a backpack is not a bag. Am I right? Am I right?"
I don't understand why JW would have wanted to take one of SS's cars that morning. He was heading to Chantilly to the Dojo. If he switched cars then he would have to come back to DC to get his own car when he wanted to leave. Seems like a waste of time, imo. And wouldn't he have said to SS, " I left the package, took the Bentley to Dojo" ...or something?
I think sometimes we are over thinking things. I feel like the simplest version of events is more likely to be the truthful one. He was at the Dojo, got an urgent call from AIW looking for SS, and he jumped into the neon bomber and rushed to the fire. JMO
No, but there is that cbs statement claiming JW parked there and returned hours later to find his car taped in. A cold (or hot/warm) car would also negate the idea postulated by many here that JW left his car there in the morning after dropping off the cash and drove away in the Porsche.
That would make the car...cold.
Great find! And I agree with you about the Herschel red lining - fits the bill.
Yeah, this does get frustrating, a backpack with red lining would make absolutely sense for both the picture sent and the fact that LE didn't find a redlined bag if they don't equate a backpack with being a bag. *sigh*. Sure looking forward to learning more facts, although it appears that facts can be interpreted by the Person-1 giving them, Person-2 hearing or reading them, Person-2 relating their understanding to Person-3, and so on.
It's so easy to misunderstand things on so many levels, especially for this. This concept would make a great game - how many ways can a (seemingly) simple description be interpreted? Is there such a game already out there? ddsmile:
grrr.
My ODD SIL (Oppositional Defiance Disorder, but ODD is so, so perfect) would say: "Of course a backpack is not a bag. Am I right? Am I right?"
I wonder how diligent they are about enforcing the 2 hour (non-resident) parking limit. In my neighborhood, it's a great source of income for the city. I would be surprised if JW regularly parked his car on the street for the day, but maybe public works/LE doesn't ticket in that neighborhood.
I wonder how diligent they are about enforcing the 2 hour (non-resident) parking limit. In my neighborhood, it's a great source of income for the city. I would be surprised if JW regularly parked his car on the street for the day, but maybe public works/LE doesn't ticket in that neighborhood.
If they ticket on itty bitty, hidden, Highland Pl., there's no way they'd give that street a pass. If the city gives any block a break, I believe it's in a different ward. (Moo, said the cash cow.)
Maybe he normally took public transportation and used their cars during the day (or even drove them home sometimes if he was to pick SS in the AM. Or parked his car in their driveway. Or a combo!
I don't remember anything from the PH about how DW got to the home. Did Defense attorney ask? Must be on neighborhood surveillance tapes.
OT. I love Highland Pl. That's my neighborhood!
ETA. I must have been thinking of a different Highland Pl. I was thinking it was near The Philips Collection. Never mind...
I always assumed this was a composite shot and DW and JW were pictured.Somehow I missed this video footage of the Porsche fire. The fire scene starts at about 1:17. Wonder if this guy is LE? (But no hint of uniform.) Here is a freeze frame of him. I have no idea what the men in DW's convoy look but I think we all know W-3's description of the Porsche driver by heart.
View attachment 79429
http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/2015/07/20/daron-wint-due-back-in-court-for-dc-mansion-savopoulos-murders/30403319/
Men are more refined, we lift the tape up for cars to get under and untie it for firetrucks.
I always assumed this was a composite shot and DW and JW were pictured.
I can see why you would think that, but this is MY freeze frame of the video. In the video, this guy is not even on for half a second. He is a flash across frame in front of camera in the foreground of the fire. He is not composed. He is in the environment and this was not created by an editor for the intention of a viewer seeing this guy. In fact, the only way you CAN see him is to freeze frame the video, otherwise he's a blur. But it's a surprisingly clear shot even for my bad eyes. (However, DW is obviously composed as he's not in environment and is in a still shot.)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wish we knew about that video clip! Is it from surveillance cameras or is it from a bystander or reporter at the scene?I can see why you would think that, but this is MY freeze frame of the video. In the video, this guy is not even on for half a second. He is a flash across frame in front of camera in the foreground of the fire. He is not composed. He is in the environment and this was not created by an editor for the intention of a viewer seeing this guy. In fact, the only way you CAN see him is to freeze frame the video, otherwise he's a blur. But it's a surprisingly clear shot even for my bad eyes. (However, DW is obviously composed as he's not in environment and is in a still shot.)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk