elementary
No More Excuses
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,077
- Reaction score
- 1
Let's talk the defence's motives:
Cheney Mason is no fool. I can't imagine he would willingly give the defence a foot bullet by submitting this motion without gambling in the defence's favour. Surely there is behind the scenes scuttlebutt about the identity of a replacement judge. I understand that R Hornsby mentions a particular judge, but that does not make it so; unless that is the scuttlebutt and the odds are stacked highly in favour of the defence.
It's also interesting to note that CM says he is on the point of retirement. He has nothing to lose for himself with regards to future appearances before JS, unlike Baez.
Cheney Mason is no fool. I can't imagine he would willingly give the defence a foot bullet by submitting this motion without gambling in the defence's favour. Surely there is behind the scenes scuttlebutt about the identity of a replacement judge. I understand that R Hornsby mentions a particular judge, but that does not make it so; unless that is the scuttlebutt and the odds are stacked highly in favour of the defence.
It's also interesting to note that CM says he is on the point of retirement. He has nothing to lose for himself with regards to future appearances before JS, unlike Baez.