sua_sponte
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 3
Imo, the ONLY thing that could fully justify her behavior during the 31 days is if she 'thought' the child was being well cared for by someone, and then when she found out she wasn't, then it was too late and she was then being threatened to be quiet and pretend like things were okay, or she would be killed herself. And that she was being 'framed.'
An 'accident' wouldn't justify her behavior,because she was so happy and care free.
Somebody abducting the child would not justify her behavior for the same reasons.
ITA. But on top of that, she lied over and over again to various people about the child's whereabouts during that carefree, happy, 31 days. Maybe she can explain away lying to her mom, but why lie to so many random people like a tattoo shop guy, and a friend's mom she ran into at the store? They have no interest or concern with who is caring for Caylee. There is no reason to lie to them. If she really thought the child was being taken care of by someone, she wouldn't have told so many different stories. That's why I think she'll never be able to justify any of this, no matter what story she comes up with at trial.
As they always say, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. I'm sure the jury will be saying this as well.