View attachment 12510For all we know it could simply be a letter in response to a subpoena that says
I have nothing, literally nothing to opine on this matter, why in the world am I being brought into this, please leave me alone.
At the recent hearing Mrs. Finnell did let the judge know that indeed the defense staff had tried to talk to these relatives in Ohio, but were met with,
"Resistance".
Judge Perry set the defense straight that no one is going to be flying to Ohio on the taxpayers dime to show up at someone's home, univited and unannounced, not even knowing their schedule, if they are even home or on holiday, etc.
He told them to get an appointment first, then come to him. If that is who they subpoenaed, perhaps AZ Lawyer can help us one more time, that may indicate the defense is not indeed finding them willing to talk and that explains the need for the subpoena.
This was the recent hearing when the judge took the defense to school on fishing expeditions. This was my favorite hearing!
Here the judge tells Ms. Finnell ( part four ) that "I don't know if they have shared this with you, but all mitigation witnesses have to be listed by November 30th, 2010. If you don't have any by the 30th of November, then you don't have any!"
Happy Thanksgiving!!!
http://www.wftv.com/news/25561067/detail.html
http://www.wftv.com/video/25567059/
http://www.wftv.com/video/25567604/
http://www.wftv.com/video/25568340/
heh