Then why did he admit into evidence the broken tiles/broken bath panel/jeans outside the window photo/broken bedroom door/hole through bedroom door.................need I go on?
None of this was mentioned or discussed during the trial so why waste court time and money taking photos and putting it into evidence...............WHY ?
Well that is a bit different
When you admit a photo of a the broken bath panel etc - they are all now in evidence before the Court. And states witness did discuss the panel but could not offer an explanation for it.
Pistorius in his EIC did offer a (laughable) explanation for the door. He did not mention the bath panel or the jeans. It's easy to see why Nel leaves these hanging.
The trouble with Frank is simple. He exists in the evidence. But what can Nel do with it?
If he puts in Frank's police statement - then that is evidence that Frank heard nothing - and in any event - the Court will expect frank to be called.
Nel clearly did not feel confident about what Frank might say. But it is not bad to leave Frank hanging.
Only it seems the Court forgot about him?