I read in the following link that you can completely dissolve a body in acid in about 2 days (excluding the teeth which would be easy to remove).
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/717344.html
I've thought for a long time that D.P. may have dissolved Stacy's body (sorry to the family for stating my graphic theory). His 3 day head clearing trip fits this theory well. That gave him enough time to transport the body, dissolve it and bury the dissolved remains and chemicals.
The barrel may or may not even be part of the burial. Plus, it wouldn't require near as much a hole. The earth wouldnt' be disturbed like it would if you dug a grave. Could have just move some top soil, poured the slurry in, let it saturate, and refill the topsoil.
This also could explain the lack of urgency to dig. It is possible that they removed soil samples during the first day and are testing for chemicals and possibly DNA (I have no idea if DNA would survive).
Perhaps this is a whack theory, but it fits what I've felt all along. I sure hope I'm wrong!
I read in the following link that you can completely dissolve a body in acid in about 2 days (excluding the teeth which would be easy to remove).
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/717344.html
I've thought for a long time that D.P. may have dissolved Stacy's body (sorry to the family for stating my graphic theory). His 3 day head clearing trip fits this theory well. That gave him enough time to transport the body, dissolve it and bury the dissolved remains and chemicals.
The barrel may or may not even be part of the burial. Plus, it wouldn't require near as much a hole. The earth wouldnt' be disturbed like it would if you dug a grave. Could have just move some top soil, poured the slurry in, let it saturate, and refill the topsoil.
This also could explain the lack of urgency to dig. It is possible that they removed soil samples during the first day and are testing for chemicals and possibly DNA (I have no idea if DNA would survive).
Perhaps this is a whack theory, but it fits what I've felt all along. I sure hope I'm wrong!
Unfortunately at Stacy's young age, not likely to have gallstones, though.I don't know about DNA, but some pieces remain:
"LONDON Dr. Keith Simpson, 78, a pathologist who once proved a murder on the basis of two gallstones, died Sunday. His evidence led to the 1949 conviction and execution of John Haigh, ''the acid bath murderer,'' when he found two gallstones, all that remained of a wealthy widow whose body Haigh had dissolved in sulfuric acid. Simpson's autobiography Forty Years of Murder was a best seller."
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1985-07-24/news/0310420139_1_john-haigh-gallstones-sulfuric-acid
Gallstones and kidney stones begin to form many years before they become a problem -- so even quite young people can have tiny stones. Anything ceramic, plastic, or some metals might survive -- fillings, caps, that kind of thing. If she was wearing something like fake fingernails, those might come through.
It partly depends on what kind of acid was used. And how much stirring he did. (oh, ick.)
Gallstones and kidney stones begin to form many years before they become a problem -- so even quite young people can have tiny stones. Anything ceramic, plastic, or some metals might survive -- fillings, caps, that kind of thing. If she was wearing something like fake fingernails, those might come through.
It partly depends on what kind of acid was used. And how much stirring he did. (oh, ick.)
Not sure what happened to all the areal views, but I believe the "burial" site was near a creek or river.so maybe dental fillings, a piece of jewery, breast implants??
Let's hope he did a lousy job and something shows up!!!
IIRC Tom M (half brother) said container was 'warm' to touch.............
and that barrel IIRC SP sister said it had pool chemicals in it then disappeared.
I remember that LE or someone traced the barrel of pool chemicals to a particular store, who had record (I think) of selling the barrel of chemicals to DP, or the clerk remembered him buying the chemicals. I remember someone being interviewed about this.
Pool chemicals are muriatic acid, which is actually hydrochloric acid. It's used in keeping pool water clean, but is also used for cleaning masonry, metals, etc. I've done a brief search, but don't know if pool chemicals would dissolve a body.
bbm.....To be clear, I don't think any chemicals would have been added to the barrel before it was moved from D.P.'s house. It would make the barrel too heavy and the fumes would have been over-powering. The barrel being warm to the touch would be the case just from having a "just deceased" body inside.Muriatic acid is very dilute compared to lab grade hydrochloric acid. Wouldn't do much to a body, but would dissolve a metal barrel. Sodium hydroxide, in contrast, would work better, and the barrel would be warm. It would corrode a metal barrel. Sodium hypochlorite would dissolve a body, and a metal barrel, but the fumes would be pretty toxic. Calcium hypochlorite--don't know for sure, except it would corrode metal.
I don't think a metal barrel is compatible with using acids or alkali to dissolve poor Stacy. Burial, yes.
Ick.
What Wikipedia has to say about dissolving (not for the faint of heart or stomach) with sodium hydroxide: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_hydroxide#Tissue_digestion
It doesn't sound like it would be hard to get hold of.
Muriatic acid is very dilute compared to lab grade hydrochloric acid. Wouldn't do much to a body, but would dissolve a metal barrel. Sodium hydroxide, in contrast, would work better, and the barrel would be warm. It would corrode a metal barrel. Sodium hypochlorite would dissolve a body, and a metal barrel, but the fumes would be pretty toxic. Calcium hypochlorite--don't know for sure, except it would corrode metal.
I don't think a metal barrel is compatible with using acids or alkali to dissolve poor Stacy. Burial, yes.
Ick.