Discussions on Formal Sentencing Hearing - Jodi Arias #9

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't understand why there are status conferences & oral arguments slated for AFTER the sentencing? What's that about?

Those later dates after sentencing have to do with the omnibus motion to dismiss the death penalty. The case calendar has not been updated to remove this yet. It would seem this is all moot now, since the death penalty no longer applies.
 
with the Milke case about to take over the spotlight and the headlines for a bit, Ms Arias must be livid.
 
DMacky, this letter was not written to Elizabeth Schilling. Lisa is someone entirely different.


Transcript (Page 1 of 2)
Phone call from Jodi A. Arias (Phoenix, Arizona) to Elizabeth (Lisa) Ann Schilling (Louisville, Kentucky) Date/time Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 10:38 a.m. MST (Phoenix time)
Duration ~6 minutes

http://aboutjodiariasandhersupporters.blogspot.com/2014/12/transcript-of-phone-call-between-ja.html

https://nationalcdp.org/board/elizabeth-ann-schilling/
 
Parts of the letter have been redacted:

View attachment 71544View attachment 71545

She mentions the person sent four "blank" postcards and that next time the sender should condense it all on a single card. LOL, my mind immediately went to invisible ink or some other secret message coded on the FOUR BLANK POSTCARDS.

Why send four cards - blank. They can't be reused for mail if they've been postmarked, so...?

Of course, I just had a thought that they were sent blank so she could draw or paint on them. *doh!* I hate when I have these thoughts while asking a question.

Nope, I still think there was a message broken up onto four cards.
 
Transcript (Page 1 of 2)
Phone call from Jodi A. Arias (Phoenix, Arizona) to Elizabeth (Lisa) Ann Schilling (Louisville, Kentucky) Date/time Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 10:38 a.m. MST (Phoenix time)
Duration ~6 minutes

http://aboutjodiariasandhersupporters.blogspot.com/2014/12/transcript-of-phone-call-between-ja.html

https://nationalcdp.org/board/elizabeth-ann-schilling/

While Schilling does go by the name Lisa, I assure you that the letter posted was not written to Schilling. As I stated before, this is an entirely different Lisa.
 
What KCL has written about MK is spot on, her information regarding his practices and agenda are accurate. At the heart of what KCL (please correct me if I am wrong KCL) is saying is that MK, in fact, is claiming to be a JOURNALIST when he is not (and to add insult to injury he writes for the most widely read newspaper in the state of AZ: The Arizona Republic); nowhere under his name does it list that he is a Commentary Journalist, Opinion Journalist, or Advocacy Journalist. And while being completely objective is a lofty goal and is a hard thing to achieve for any journalist/reporter, what matters is that the reporter strives/aspires to realize this goal. Not the exact opposite, like MK, of getting as much of your personal opinion and agenda into what is reported while trying to hide your lack of objectivity.

There are four main types of news reporters/writers today; Journalists, Commentary Journalists, Opinion Journalists and Advocacy Journalists. All of which are fine as long as they are clearly identified and defined as to what they actually are. In fact, there are plenty of commentary journalists out there, many of whom I disagree with but respect simply because they are up front and honest about the fact that they are COMMENTARY JOURNALISTS or the like.. Commentary, Opinion and Advocacy Journalism (btw-AJ is especially known for inaccuracies and outright untruths)should NEVER be presented as objective/credible/neutral news reporting (i.e., Journalism in it's true form).

Journalism is about Credibility, Objectivity and Neutrality--the factual information is imparted and the viewer is left to determine what the information means to them without IMPROPER INFLUENCE. It is, nothing more or nothing less than insulting to tell someone how they should think, feel, or respond to news information--and for these opinion/commentary/advocacy journalists to use powerful platforms, under the guise of Journalism, to spew and propogate their worldviews/personal agendas borders on being a propagandist in my view..

So the core concern/issue related to MK's articles as I see it, is simple, he is not a Journalist. It is not about how he looks, whether or not you like his writing style, or even about the content of the topics he writes about...it is about whether he is telling being factual and whether or not he projects his own opinions/biases into what he writes.

FWIW, by definition, his J17 piece was a perfect example of Opinion Journalism and Advocacy Journalism combined, disingenuously masquerading as Journalism.

:loveyou: :happydance: :clap::dance::great::tyou:
 
According to her contract MDLR should be done.

Duties of Mitigation Specialist
Contractor shall maintain regular contact with the Client as counsel directs until the assignment ends.
Assignment ends at the time the notice of intent to seek the death penalty is withdrawn or dismissed, or the client is sentenced , whichever occurs first.


http://www.maricopa.gov/OPDS/Assets...tracts/Service_Provider_Contracts/11075-c.pdf ...(P.4)
 
I agree. I'm not a fan of his type of journalism but I have to give him big props. A teacher once told me that all an ad had to do was get your attention. To me this is the same. He, as a writer, needs to grab your attention. I think it's in his personality to enjoy it all. That he's become the defense darling isn't wrong, we just don't like it. That's on us.
I don't think he's doing anything less or more than going with what's given to him... that's kinda his job. He and I would never be BFFs in reality land but I can't take it away from him. He's a reporter, he's reporting. It's in the job description.

Just get their attention? Really-that is the only standard they have to meet?
That didn't work out too well for Brian Williams....
 
According to her contract MDLR should be done.

Duties of Mitigation Specialist
Contractor shall maintain regular contact with the Client as counsel directs until the assignment ends.
Assignment ends at the time the notice of intent to seek the death penalty is withdrawn or dismissed, or the client is sentenced , whichever occurs first.


http://www.maricopa.gov/OPDS/Assets...tracts/Service_Provider_Contracts/11075-c.pdf ...(P.4)

IIRC her contract was renewed thru 2018. Someone posted details here, at the time.
 
I thought they were 4 gift cards, which she gave to MDLR.
She mentions the person sent four "blank" postcards and that next time the sender should condense it all on a single card. LOL, my mind immediately went to invisible ink or some other secret message coded on the FOUR BLANK POSTCARDS.

Why send four cards - blank. They can't be reused for mail if they've been postmarked, so...?

Of course, I just had a thought that they were sent blank so she could draw or paint on them. *doh!* I hate when I have these thoughts while asking a question.

Nope, I still think there was a message broken up onto four cards.
 
JSS has allowed until the 28th to file motions opposing live-streaming the sentencing. Has anyone seen anything yet? Do you think the defense will file anything? I think if they do it will be at the last minute, but I'm not sure they will.
 
IIRC her contract was renewed thru 2018. Someone posted details here, at the time.
My impression was she was discussing the specific Arias assignment.
Sounds like the overall show must go on through 2018ish, huh? Oh dear.
 
I thought they were 4 gift cards, which she gave to MDLR.

OH! Thank you! I need more coffee, lol - reading comprehension low. :/

ETA: arghhhhhh I went back and read it again and again, I'm not sure there were four gift cards. She says she received the four cards, and after that says "thank you for the gift card, it will go to MDLR" (paraphrasing)

ja's not always clear. Unless she's lying; those are pretty clear, lol.
 
JSS has allowed until the 28th to file motions opposing live-streaming the sentencing. Has anyone seen anything yet? Do you think the defense will file anything? I think if they do it will be at the last minute, but I'm not sure they will.


:seeya: I have not seen anything -- YET !

JMO but I have NO doubt that Nurmi and Willmott will file an Opposition to live-streaming because JA :jail: will not want to be seen in costume -- stripes and shackles !

:gaah:

Again JMO, but I have NO doubt that IF JA and her DT file an opposition to live-streaming, JSS will grant it !

Again, :gaah:
 
My impression was she was discussing the specific Arias assignment.
Sounds like the overall show must go on through 2018ish, huh? Oh dear.

I am not sure, it was posted some time ago, maybe YorN remembers....it was explained, that yes, MDLR contract was renewed but not just for the FJA case. MDLR can work on other cases, it was just not a contract for FJA. Also, it was explained that MDLR might stay on until the sentencing next month to show midigation reasons as to why FJA should not get LWOP....but should be allowed out in 25 years. I hope that all made sense. So MDLR is still midigating for it. These comments were written here on WS about 3 weeks ago and I don't remember if was YorN, Bernina, or AZL or who commented, but they were very knowledgable.
 
I've seen reporters on the other side of this who are just as vehement in their own opinions, I also thought his article about Juror 17 made a lot of sense .. I get that you don't like him, and that's perfectly fine, but MK is no idiot IMO, and I think some of the reaction to him goes a bit far (not you) xoxo

Yes, but MK is biased in such a mean-hearted way. It's not like he's throwing out a differing voice on a subject for purposes of discussion. It's not like he's trying to get people to open their minds and see things in more than just black or white. I see varying opinions all the time from people I respect, not for their opinion but for the way they express it.

We had a member on WS in the Caylee forums whose opinion was unpopular, yet that member was highly respected in the forums. That is because their posts got people thinking, and all their posts were very respective of others' opinions. They took a stance that never wavered because it was a stance they truly believed in, and even though I did not agree with much that they said, I thoroughly enjoyed reading their posts because I found them to be well thought out and sincere. Defensive, not offensive.

MK either doesn't have a clue, or he does and just does not care.
 
She mentions the person sent four "blank" postcards and that next time the sender should condense it all on a single card. LOL, my mind immediately went to invisible ink or some other secret message coded on the FOUR BLANK POSTCARDS.

Why send four cards - blank. They can't be reused for mail if they've been postmarked, so...?

Of course, I just had a thought that they were sent blank so she could draw or paint on them. *doh!* I hate when I have these thoughts while asking a question.

Nope, I still think there was a message broken up onto four cards.

Lisa sent 4 post cards purchased at the post office and she wrote only on the side with the address, meaning that the back was blank. No invisible ink, no secret messages. Sorry peeps. I guess CMJA wanted something longer than just a postcard. My jaded view is also CMJA exerting power and control by telling this person what to do, instead of thanking them for writing. CMJA continues this with arbitrarily making the decision to let Maria have the gift card for herself.
 
Amanda Knox's final appeal to the highest Italian court will be this week of April 23. No sure exactly which day or if the verdict will be rendered immediately. Couldn't find an open discussion about this on WS.

About Jodi Arias, why the appeals to postpone the inevitable? All this is doing is costing more. On the other hand, I can see how this is actually good for less appeal issues. Get it all over with now, put the murderer in a cage and tell her to STFU because legally everything has been done. Jodi will try to find appeal issues. What else is there for her to do?
 
Another thing I'm wondering about is Jodi's next series of appeals.
-Do you think she'll throw Nurmi and Wilmott to the wolves and say they hated her and advised her on a bad defense strategy?
-I wonder what bizarre excuse she'll use for her next appeal: Maybe Mulitple Personality Disorder, or perhaps CMJA will pull an even more bizarre story than the ninja's out of her thumb? I can just imagine her saying she was the victim of a secret government mind control experiment and that they programmed her to kill TA because he was blah blah (insert stoopid CMJA accusation here). And THEN, the government deliberately altered her memory so that when her 'fog' cleared she was given false memories that TA abused her and she acted in self defense. Seriously, she is loop-de-loop :cuckoo: enough to think up something like this and all the conspiracy nuts will start jumping up and down and she can claim even bigger 'victim' status. Or heck, what about when she visited Roswell NM and got abducted by aliens who made her kill TA? :ufo:

I foresee a long visit to a prison psychiatric center and a series of ShockTherapy in Jodi Arias future if she tries that.
 
Lisa sent 4 post cards purchased at the post office and she wrote only on the side with the address, meaning that the back was blank. No invisible ink, no secret messages. Sorry peeps. I guess CMJA wanted something longer than just a postcard. My jaded view is also CMJA exerting power and control by telling this person what to do, instead of thanking them for writing. CMJA continues this with arbitrarily making the decision to let Maria have the gift card for herself.

Okay, four blank postcards. Why would the sender leave the other, larger side blank if not for invisible ink supahsecret messages? (just kidding, don't ream me for having fun) Then ja could use the blank sides for art. I'm projecting because that's what I do: all blank surface for me = canvas! :D Having been in a position to not be able to afford art supplies/paper, we creatives will use anything as a surface. Blank postcards would be a godsend. ATC= Artist Trading Cards are business card size works of art that are traded and collected like baseball cards. ETA: I agree with you about ja's need to control everything including how and what someone will gift her. Sheesh. Chuckling at how generous she is by giving the giftcard to mdlr. The flip side of this, is that we learn more and more about how involved mdlr is with her client.

As for wanting a letter instead of postcards - I read that ja was only allowed to receive postcards. What's the poop on that?

Sorry, off on tangent, must go create :) :loveyou:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
2,173
Total visitors
2,266

Forum statistics

Threads
603,784
Messages
18,163,053
Members
231,861
Latest member
Eliver
Back
Top