Cover up of abuse of some kind(s) by someone(s) definitely seems to be motive for this crime....
http://jonbenetramsey.pbworks.com/w/page/11682469/Evidence%20of%20Prior%20Sexual%20Abuse
Expert Panel. "In mid-September, a panel of pediatric experts from around the country reached one of the major conclusions of the investigation - that JonBenet had suffered vaginal trauma prior to the day she was killed. There were
no dissenting opinions among them on the issue, and they firmly rejected any possibility that the trauma to the hymen and chronic vaginal inflammation were caused by urination issues or masturbation. We gathered affidavits stating in clear language that there were injuries
'consistent with prior trauma and sexual abuse' 'There was chronic abuse'. . .'Past violation of the vagina'. . . 'Evidence of both acute injury
and chronic sexual abuse.' In other words, the doctors were saying it had happened before. One expert summed it up well when he said the injuries were not consistent with sexual assault, but with a child who was being physically abused."
Interesting tidbit here --
Michael Doberson, MD. On the question of whether the autopsy findings indicated chronic abuse, "Arapahoe County Coroner Dr. Michael Doberson says you would need more information before you could come to any conclusion. That was part of Smith's job.
But then she was abruptly pulled off the investigation and told police were handling everything." [Editor's Note:
**Holly Smith** was head of Boulder Country Sexual Abuse Team].
...Would be something if it really is Holly Smith that is the person who will soon speak, wouldn't it?.....
Also of note:
"Grab
marks on the arms and inner thighs are also strongly suggestive of sex abuse, especially thumb marks on the inner aspect of the thigh, placed there when the child's legs were forced apart."
___
Yes, Barbie nightgown has blood on it....Blanket has blood on it.... they are both in the wine cellar for a reason...or at least, due to being part of the crime, that is....
There's definitely some missing bloody clothes somewhere...
It's curious the bloody barbie nightgown is left behind in the wine cellar, though, and the other bloody clothes are not....
And is probably what is meant by them 'accidentally' being there, just like John's curious statement of 'that's not supposed to be there'.... (Because what - everything else IS supposed to be there? JonBenet is perfectly normal murdered in the wine cellar, as you expect, but no, not the Barbie nightgown - that's just.. just, too strange)? I think that tells us a lot...And if it was from the laundry with the blanket, how'd it get blood on it then? If it was the item used to wipe her down, does it match any of the fibers found on her/in her 'area', and/or is the blood on the nightgown consistent with wiping/smearing of blood, and not just drops....For that matter, how'd the blanket get blood on it? If there is no blood on her outer area, and the only blood we find out about on her is hidden close to her body in that underwear, then blood had to get on the blanket somehow too...
There is another set of bloody items somewhere....
So, part of the speculation on that particular item, is, it still could have been 'overloooked' and left behind in the wine cellar 'accidentally' in, or rather, on the blanket (but NOT as part of the clean laundry, per se), but maybe as part of the crime, and was supposed to have been disposed of along with the other bloody clothes, but was not... and is why that 'is not supposed to be there'? ....