Curious Me
Who When Where What Why & How
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,619
- Reaction score
- 115,032
:spit: No. Do I look that stupid or that gullible?
She sure showed a lot of emotion at the hot body contest!!!
No, I have a difficult time believing anything that comes out of his mouth.
NO! JB's opening statement was a work of fiction that has KC written all over it! It's her latest lie, and as usual, she paints herself as blameless.......a victim.
NO! JB's opening statement was a work of fiction that has KC written all over it! It's her latest lie, and as usual, she paints herself as blameless....... a victim.
JB and ICA are two peas in a pod.
Perhaps we should start a thread asking whether people can think up theories less plausible than that offered by the DT. Now that would be a display of creativity.
I am waiting to hear how Kronk went up and down alleyways looking for dead children that were triple bagged with duct tape across their face so he could haul them around for 5 months to get a reward. This well be a real doozy when he shows up on the stand.
Over these past three years I have come to despise the defence team, especially Baez (and Lyon). Yet looking at his opening statement what strikes me the most is that he points the finger at others, as if he were the prosecutor. I am not sure that is the the job of the defence. And if the defence Is going to take this stance then they bloody well better back it up. If I were a juror, I would want proof. Kinda weird, this kind of defence, if you think about it.
They really have to make a case for an identifiable killer the way they 've laid it out. In
this case the murderer can't even be Joe Shmoe. The killer has to be identified, like George, Roy Kronk, Lee, whoever. The defence has painted themselves into a corner.
Sadly, like Patsy and John Ramsey. Casey will probably never confess. What are the language skills of a 2 and 1/2 year old? We know how verbal her mom and gma are so they were probably advanced for her age. Maybe one stressor was that Caylee would soon tell everyone her Mom did not have a job at Universal. I am sure most of us hope Casey will be convicted. But maybe the jury will look at her and think no one that pretty could kill a child and ignore the evidence. If OJ could be acquited anyone could. JMO.
http://www.wftv.com/video/28009322/index.html
Watch starting at 14.16 and you will see Cheney telling the lawyer to pass the Kleenex and says somehting to KC and she shakes her head yes. Soon after Baez starts talking about sexual abuse and KC starts crying and covers her face BUT APPARENTLY NOT ENOUGH BECAUSE
WATCH as Cheney tells her to cover her face and motions with his hands how to do it.
She obviously needs help in pretense.
When..
Here's what I don't get.....
All JB needs to get her off is "reasonable doubt". Wouldn't a competent DT have taken the following position, acknowledging all the evidence but explaining it away?:
- Caylee drowned in the pool.
- Casey panicked, went into shock, PTSD, etc. Bad relationship w/ her parents over her ability as a mother so felt she couldn't report it. Hid the body in the backyard that night.
- Went back the next day, attempted to bury body but it didn't work. Due to decomp (as per the SA witness) fluid had begun to pour from mouth and nose.
- Casey covered the mouth and nose with duct tape to stop the fluid.
- Put body in trunk and disposed of it in the swamp 3 days later.
- PTSD and denial led to her behavior for the next 31 days.
Reasonable doubt accomplished!