Ricki
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 7,422
- Reaction score
- 1,198
It does bring it all back, doesn't it?
Yea it does and it brings the anger back also
It does bring it all back, doesn't it?
??? Astrophysical?? that relates to Astronomy.
I believe she said Asphyxial.
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!
That is something I have always thought ... but no proof anywhere. It just is so unreal to me they never found her guilty of at least "child neglect".No evidence but my hinky meter but I bet JB had someone get to a juror or two.
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!
OT: the hoarders commercial for their upcoming show is making me sick...
I totally agree. Who?? doesn't look around them? UnrealI do not think they should choose jurors that do NOT listen to the news or read the papers or listen to talk radio. When you narrow your entire jury down to people who do not care about their world, or their community, and who do not wonder about what is going on around them, then you are going to keep getting verdicts like that, imo. You will keep getting people who cannot connect the dots because they do not care enough about the outcome to do so.
I do not think they should choose jurors that do NOT listen to the news or read the papers or listen to talk radio. When you narrow your entire jury down to people who do not care about their world, or their community, and who do not wonder about what is going on around them, then you are going to keep getting verdicts like that, imo. You will keep getting people who cannot connect the dots because they do not care enough about the outcome to do so.
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!
Clip of JB talking about science. Oooookaaaayyy