Dr G. to do special about Caylee

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
??? Astrophysical?? that relates to Astronomy.
I believe she said Asphyxial.

Sorry, I caught that but still have the wrong spelling but at least you know what I meant. LOL
 
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!
 
They show a photo of Baez in court and Dr G says vehemently "He had the NERVE to call my work shoddy?"
 
I still cannot stomach hearing the ng words or the opening statement;
I apologize if mo of is not allowed.
 
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!

I would have bet everything I own that they would have found her guilty of murder or manslaughter- the only indecision I had was which they would come up with and whether they would impose the DP. Never in a zillion years should anyone who listened thoughtfully to all that evidence find her not guilty.
 
No evidence but my hinky meter but I bet JB had someone get to a juror or two.
That is something I have always thought ... but no proof anywhere. It just is so unreal to me they never found her guilty of at least "child neglect".
 
OT: the hoarder’s commercial for their upcoming show is making me sick...
 
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!

I do not think they should choose jurors that do NOT listen to the news or read the papers or listen to talk radio. When you narrow your entire jury down to people who do not care about their world, or their community, and who do not wonder about what is going on around them, then you are going to keep getting verdicts like that, imo. You will keep getting people who cannot connect the dots because they do not care enough about the outcome to do so.
 
This is the only trial I followed from "breaking news" til the end of trial. It hurt my heart so much. Caylee deserved so much more than this. I pray karma pays it's due upon Casey.
 
OT: the hoarder’s commercial for their upcoming show is making me sick...

I know right? I think I saw an ad for a new season where there is a dead something or other under the pile.

I love that pic of Caylee in her bandana
 
I do not think they should choose jurors that do NOT listen to the news or read the papers or listen to talk radio. When you narrow your entire jury down to people who do not care about their world, or their community, and who do not wonder about what is going on around them, then you are going to keep getting verdicts like that, imo. You will keep getting people who cannot connect the dots because they do not care enough about the outcome to do so.
I totally agree. Who?? doesn't look around them? Unreal
 
That's true, they didn't call Dr. G as a rebuttal to Dr. Spitz
 
I do not think they should choose jurors that do NOT listen to the news or read the papers or listen to talk radio. When you narrow your entire jury down to people who do not care about their world, or their community, and who do not wonder about what is going on around them, then you are going to keep getting verdicts like that, imo. You will keep getting people who cannot connect the dots because they do not care enough about the outcome to do so.

Or do really know about the case and simply lie about it during Jury questioning because they want to be on a celebrity Jury for personal reasons.
 
She's still outraged. she said she didn't do a thorough job just because it was a high profile case, "this was a two-year old little girl that was found in the woods!"
 
It still boggles my mind, how the jury found her not guilty of anything , but lying!!!


I agree! How can you be convicted of lying about something you didn't do? If you didn't do it, why'd you have to lie? Defies all basic common sense. :sigh:
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
192
Total visitors
267

Forum statistics

Threads
608,901
Messages
18,247,463
Members
234,496
Latest member
Alex03
Back
Top