natsound
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,129
- Reaction score
- 1,932
I agree. I do not think anything Cindy said at trial really mattered to the jury. They actually said they gave her words no consideration, believing her to be on medication and not thinking clearly.
I also do not blame the A's for what happened to Caylee. I believe they covered for Casey all her life for a variety of misdeeds and maybe even some criminal activity, whether charged or not. However, I do not believe the parents had reason to believe Casey was going to harm Caylee. Yes, they could have acted much sooner than 31 days; it wouldn't have saved Caylee but might have gotten the legal ball rolling sooner and possibly affected the outcome of this case.
My beef with the Anthonys is this "foundation" they are setting up. It's a way to get money without working for it, and it cannot be denied that Caylee's death has made this windfall possible. This kind of activity does not honor Caylee's memory and even though other parents/grandparents of crime victims have turned into advocates after the fact, the Anthonys have not shown any advocacy effort to date. Yet, they have brought in mega-bucks under the guise of advocacy. I cannot condone this.
ITA... very well put.
CA was just plain airheaded to believe everything KC was telling her during the business trip. If it were me, I would have thought SOMETHING was wrong, but because KC exhibited no distress on the phone, I don't think I would have believed in a million years that Caylee was dead. I probably would have thought, KC's playing a game, she's hiding Caylee from me, and this has gone on long enough.
As far as the foundation goes, I haven't seen the new foundation get on its feet yet. I'm disappointed to see the website for Caylee's Fund still up, and abandoned by all appearances (it hasn't been updated since 2009), but as others have pointed out, the "donate now" button still works just fine!