Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think what they were TRYING to show, was that the insurance policy would not have paid out in cases of MURDER, but since they did pay out, then it was not murder...?
In Session Judge: You certainly wouldnt be able to impeach Anna [Domans] testimony with something Susan said to the insurance agent. Or vice versa . . . I dont see the support in my minutes or in the transcript that would identify this as testimony impeaching her so that it would be admissible . . . how would the fact that one person said that to the insurance agent indicate that the other person was being untruthful? . . . I dont see how this impeaches that testimony . . . the witness is not going to be able to testify to either of those, because they dont impeach anything.
<snipped by me>
Okay....and the purpose of this witness for the defense was....? :floorlaugh:
This could/should be emotional testimony and testimony that could sway the jury. :twocents:
The Herald-News ‏@Joliet_HN
Greenberg: Kind of off-topic: if you had to wear a jersey today, what jersey would you be wearing? #DrewPeterson
The Herald-News ‏@Joliet_HN
Pontarelli: Sox. Greenberg: Instant credibility! #DrewPeterson
OMG!! :what:
Has the defense case started yet?