Waitaminute
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2013
- Messages
- 181
- Reaction score
- 3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Attorney: Security Video Exonerates Dina Shacknai in Death of Rebecca Zahau
NBC 7 Investigates obtained video from Attorney Keith Greer, who got it from the San Diego County Sheriffs Department after several years of trying he says. It shows Dina Shacknai was inside Rady Children's Hospital when Zahau died.
Attorney Greer says the video changed his mind about the death of Rebecca Zahau.
"Previously we had an eye witness who was adamant putting Dina at the scene of the murder, Greer said.
Greer said it took him years to get the security camera footage from the San Diego County Sheriff's Department, which investigated Zahau's death, and called it a suicide.
When these pictures came out, you can't refute them," he said.
While he is still adamant Zahau was murdered, he now says Dina Shacknai was not the killer.
Greer also dropped Dina's sister, Nina Romano, from the lawsuit, after she provided information he says cleared her.
The amended lawsuit now names just one suspect, in Zahau's death: Max's uncle.
"Greer says it's all in DNA evidence on the knife Adam Shacknai used to cut down the body, a knife stained with Zahau's blood.
"It was all the way around the knife, all four sides," said Greer. "She was violated by the handle of the knife that was inserted into her."
This in black and white should stop the frenzied, hysterical; hate filled postings by those that bird dogged these threads ranting about Dina.
Just as many of us thought but only allowed ourselves to hint at- it’s Adam.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Security-Video-Dina-Shacknai-in-Death-of-Rebecca-Zahau-419896223.html
I strongly disagree that there will be any "justice" for Rebecca, now or ever. Certainly there will be a "conclusion" to the civil lawsuit at some point, but that isn't justice for a murder. The time for JUSTICE for Rebecca's heinous, sadistic death, and JUSTICE for the appalling treatment she was given AFTER her death, by so many bad actors, is long past.
There will be no "peace" in the conclusion/ resolution of the civil case, IMO.
Regardless of the outcome, IMO, the criminal case will never be re-opened.
IMO, Dina and Nina are not "victims" in this lawsuit. They both thoroughly deserve all of the public scrutiny and criticism they received, as a result of their OWN actions. They don't get a "pass" on their behavior because of an excuse of their grief over Max's death, IMO. Dina was spiteful, vindictive, and hateful toward Rebecca long before Max died. Her NDAs prevented her from full on attacks toward Jonah, as her $$ was at stake, but her constant bad behaviors toward Rebecca were her game moves to get back at Jonah, IMO. And Max, IMO, was a pawn in her game, too-- surely she loved him dearly, but she was also willing to USE him to her advantage to get back at Jonah and Rebecca.
Dina's public attacks on XZ, suggesting she murdered Max, were simply appalling and clearly beyond the pale. This, from someone who claimed to "be" a child psychologist?? (And publicly lied a lot about her "career" as well.)
The dead on arrival "nonprofit" Dina vindictively started to get back at Jonah, and Rebecca? (Tit for tat-- have a few parties and hide some money.)
The "vindictive legislation" she wanted to promote, that further victimized and exploited REAL child murder victims of sexual abuse and unspeakable trauma? Without permission from their parents or their memorial foundations? The lies she told publicly about that legislation?
It stinks to high heaven that only AFTER Dina and Nina are dropped from the civil case, does Dina NOW claim that she believes Rebecca had nothing to do with Max's death. She can't undo years of her own appalling behavior. Her PUBLIC actions amply show vindictiveness and cruelty-- her own words and behavior prove that over and over. ONLY now, after being dropped from the civil case, does she stop attacking Rebecca, and her family. That's just a little "too" convenient for my taste. I have to wonder, as with other "shut up" clauses she was subjected to in various lawsuits, if her current claims about now "believing" Rebecca didn't kill Max, and her subsequent silence about Adam and the case, are the result of part of her deal struck for being dropped from the current lawsuit.
There will be no "peace" in the conclusion/ resolution of the civil case, IMO. Just an end to the lawsuit.
Regardless of the outcome, IMO, the criminal murder case will never be re-opened.
Justice for Rebecca.
Being rich and connected is not an excuse for getting away with murder. If California won't do the right thing, time for the Feds to step in. There are Federal implications in this case. Civil rights for one, but the financial crimes might cross state lines and elevate this to a Federal crime. If I'm Rebecca's family lawyer, and maybe they've already done this, I'm going to the FBI, the media, the Myanmar embassy, I put hellfire and condemnation not only on the suspects but their lawyers for shielding a rich murderer or murderers who brutally murdered a young Asian woman and got away with it.
Play the race card? Absolutely, if that's what it takes to get justice.
The Shacknais should be shunned, investigated, put up for scrutiny. Enough with rich people hiding behind lawyers. We need Grand Jury laws in all states. Force these suspicious characters to testify. They can sit there with a lawyer at their side. But they must testify. If they take the Fifth on every question, that's enough probable cause to issue an indictment and throw their worthless psychopathic asses in jail.
This in black and white should stop the frenzied, hysterical; hate filled postings by those that bird dogged these threads ranting about Dina.
Just as many of us thought but only allowed ourselves to hint at- its Adam.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/lo...knai-in-Death-of-Rebecca-Zahau-419896223.html
We need to examine the entire justice system, top to bottom, in light of forensic evidence. Prosecutors rely on facts from forensics, but defense attorneys are allowed to lie in court. Why? Why are these liars allowed to tell bald-faced lies that prejudice the jury?
Let's go for the obvious example. Casey Anthony's attorney offered the defense: her dad raped her and molested her.
There is no evidence of that.
None.
Why is that admitted into court? Why? Baez should have been admonished, restrained, for introducing theories with zero evidence. Defense attorneys have too much power. Time for a hard swing back to justice.
Oh go ahead and say it [emoji1]Agree. And I can't say in polite company what I think should've happened to Jose Baez.
Some news from Keith Greer...
The motion for summary judgement has been denied. Jury selection is scheduled for the 26th.
Some news from Keith Greer...
The motion for summary judgement has been denied. Jury selection is scheduled for the 26th.