Mollyandme
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2013
- Messages
- 1,388
- Reaction score
- 698
This is in response to lash, for some
Reason my phone is acting up
And I can't quote so I apologize!
No I had no clue what LHK was until
I read your post and googled it with RZs last name and found what you are referring too. And yes, that is not right to publically harass others. I had no idea many of you were targeted that way and as a human being it bothers and upsets me to see fellow posters publicly mocked on a clearly agenda driven forum. It certainly explains some of the tension and after browsing around for ten mins to see the posts you referred to I now need a shower.
this is the only place I research or discuss this case aside from looking up California civil procedures and previously federal procedures. I hope I do not engage in baiting bc it's disrespectful and I have been a member here long enough to know the rules. If it appears that way it's not my intent and please tell a mod so they can let me know. Websleuths is the only place I discuss true crime due to the rules and the ability to agree to disagree respectfully. I don't see the point of a discussion when every single person has the same opinion, even if it's a small detail where there's a difference of opinion, everyone has brought good points to this forum at some point IMO.
I know many don't agree with my personal opinion on this specific case but I have tried and will try to remain respectful. This is the first case I have followed where my opinion is in the "minority" but I really just want the truth to come out regardless of what it ultimately is for all parties involved. I should have added a "jmo" about feeling ganged up on and not stated it as fact and for that I will apologize, but I won't apologize for my unpopular opinion on RZ's death. I don't think it's victim blaming to agree with the manner of death as suicide and to point to the investigation as evidence and past behaviors that were explored during the initial investigation. likewise, the plaintiffs will be doing the same investigations on the defendants and Dinas past has been discussed as well which is to be expected in a WDS where she is listed as a defendant
I have learned a lot from reading the different view points and even if no one agrees with mine, maybe at least it's helpful in some way to see what others with a different opinion think and why. If not, I totally understand and respect the good old "scroll and roll."
Thank you for your thoughtful post Lash. Have a happy new year
Reason my phone is acting up
And I can't quote so I apologize!
No I had no clue what LHK was until
I read your post and googled it with RZs last name and found what you are referring too. And yes, that is not right to publically harass others. I had no idea many of you were targeted that way and as a human being it bothers and upsets me to see fellow posters publicly mocked on a clearly agenda driven forum. It certainly explains some of the tension and after browsing around for ten mins to see the posts you referred to I now need a shower.
this is the only place I research or discuss this case aside from looking up California civil procedures and previously federal procedures. I hope I do not engage in baiting bc it's disrespectful and I have been a member here long enough to know the rules. If it appears that way it's not my intent and please tell a mod so they can let me know. Websleuths is the only place I discuss true crime due to the rules and the ability to agree to disagree respectfully. I don't see the point of a discussion when every single person has the same opinion, even if it's a small detail where there's a difference of opinion, everyone has brought good points to this forum at some point IMO.
I know many don't agree with my personal opinion on this specific case but I have tried and will try to remain respectful. This is the first case I have followed where my opinion is in the "minority" but I really just want the truth to come out regardless of what it ultimately is for all parties involved. I should have added a "jmo" about feeling ganged up on and not stated it as fact and for that I will apologize, but I won't apologize for my unpopular opinion on RZ's death. I don't think it's victim blaming to agree with the manner of death as suicide and to point to the investigation as evidence and past behaviors that were explored during the initial investigation. likewise, the plaintiffs will be doing the same investigations on the defendants and Dinas past has been discussed as well which is to be expected in a WDS where she is listed as a defendant
I have learned a lot from reading the different view points and even if no one agrees with mine, maybe at least it's helpful in some way to see what others with a different opinion think and why. If not, I totally understand and respect the good old "scroll and roll."
Thank you for your thoughtful post Lash. Have a happy new year