Sometimes with controversial outcomes it takes awhile...When are we going to find out the jury breakdown???? Why have we not heard from even ONE juror?
Sometimes with controversial outcomes it takes awhile...When are we going to find out the jury breakdown???? Why have we not heard from even ONE juror?
This is too funny. I am only 5'2" and I noted the size of the doll. That would be very very creepy.You don't know the half of it, my sister teases her teen gkids with patty. They are really disturbed by her. The kids insist she put her away when they visit, but sis brings her out when they least expect it. Like when they are asleep she will stand her at the end of the bed(she's tall) and take a photo to show them in the morning.
is WA Fifty's Helen of Troy ?
Witness protection....Since you said speculate in my own opinion and imagination, here goes.....
I have no facts, just observations from looking into the eyes of the accused and the deceased and what I feel. First I took a look at Dan and saw honest emotion shining for all to see. Next I looked deep into Garcia and all that resonated was sadness. What I saw from Rivera was cold, hard and unfeeling. Katherine showed not one bit of sadness or remorse and it seemed she was showing strength. Finally Wendi. I was overwhelmed at the manipulation emanating from her. Her smugness, her cunning, her detachment. Deflecting suspicion elsewhere and offering up diversions that leave her blameless and oh so innocent. I'm not falling for it, she is the ONE that benefited from all this. I intentionally left out ma, pa, and brother but they also played their devious part and without their heartless involvement and money Dan would still be here. Wendi, with her influence and emotional exploitation maneuvered her family to get on board and finance this evil deed. And Katherine was more than willing to get on the money train and possibly even suggested providing the means to eliminate Dan. The means being Garcia, who in turn recruited Rivera. You can see where I'm going with this and I know it goes against all the evidence presented so far, but that evidence mainly comes from the mouth of Rivera, who I suspect actually pulled the trigger. Garcia is taking the fall since he was the one that recruited Rivera to make the hit and he is doing his best to protect Katherine the mother of his children. Katherine has kept quiet and sat in jail for three years because she can't implicate Rivera without dire consequences. In my opinion there is no other reason she would not come clean and tell all. She fears for her life and that of her family.
Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!
Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset.
Ok how did she act after the arrests? Do you care to expound? All my LE and professional psycho analytical pals say she is cold and hated DM. I know it is conjecture. I for one feel she had no foreknowledge but definitely knew ex post facto.Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!
Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset.
Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!
Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset.
Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!
Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset.
You seem genuine and I do appreciate your views even if they contrast with mine. You also appear to be an independent and critical thinker. Having said that, what do you make of her disregarding what the world can see and raising her sons under the wings of those who allegedly (based on a load of evidence and no other explainable link to the convicted killers) executed their other loving parent. I mean, as far as character goes, not a good look.
Juror Interview - Part 1 - Dan Markel's Murder Trial - State vs. Garcia and Magbanua
Mentour Lawyer
Thanks, I listened. And I subscribed. Not much on this first one and the sound was terrible, but he asked her about jury makeup and what questions the jurors maybe should have been asked beforehand. I think. I'm listening again.
Yeah. Talking about jury selection in Part 1. Part 1 not that juicy. I want to hear about deliberations. I had to use earphones to hear, but the sound got better towards the end. This series will give us great insight into what went on in that Jury Room.
Thanks GordonX!Juror Interview - Part 1 - Dan Markel's Murder Trial - State vs. Garcia and Magbanua
Mentour Lawyer