nodamselindistress
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Messages
- 2,413
- Reaction score
- 26,104
Early marriage details coming in now. It was weird to me not to go chronologically but I guess Taylor had his reasons.
IA(also)NAL, but they've just read out text messages between DB and his ex-wife. Two persons who are now deceased and therefore neither are available to verify their legitimacy or context behind them. Is that not the most egregious piece of hearsay ever admitted as evidence in court?Are any of the texts being read now by defense counsel into the record prejudicial? Relevance? What were her responses to them at that time? Are those not being shared with the jury? SMH
IANAL. MOO
Thanks bobbymkii! I had missed that other key point. Those were texts between the late DB and his other now deceased wife? SMH……. If so…… Unbelievable….. simply astonishing. How was that allowed or relevant for this case or trial? IA(also)NAL…. MOOIA(also)NAL, but they've just read out text messages between DB and his ex-wife. Two persons who are now deceased and therefore neither are available to verify their legitimacy or context behind them. Is that not the most egregious piece of hearsay ever admitted as evidence in court?
MOO
Hmmm...
It seems he was bankrupt, no?
Were the ballerinas employed in failed business paid?
I must dive deeper into the case.
Kinda weird they didn't go into how they met, how the home life was, etc, etc. Just right into the day of the shooting. It's very odd how much has NOT been allowed into this trial. I have no idea how their marriage went downhill or anything about it from her side. I want to know why she really left him to go have her baby away from him. What event(s) made her want to leave this man and the marriage. Something beside morning sickness made her want to get out of it. If that is all being suppressed by the court, I think that is going to be a problem.
This is her chance and there's no build-up to the shooting really. I don't know if it's because the defense has been so limited in their ability to show any hint of prior domestic violence. I think she should at least be able to show that prior events show her frame of mind going into this event. Without it, I don't see how she walks away from this.
On the other hand I don't think the prosecution's case showed a whole lot either. All we have is the forensics and I don't think we really got a good picture of what really happened thru that.
I've been following different streams that different crime channels are streaming on YouTube and I've been monitoring the chats. There's a surprising amount of support for her. Here, it seems like everyone has made up their minds. I haven't yet.
Very true. I worry about this happening.(Snipped)
Some ppl think hurting animals deserves the death penalty so it’s not unfathomable some jurors will hate this victim just based on that alone.