VERDICT WATCH FL - Doug Benefield, 58, shot and killed by estranged wife, Manatee County, 27 Sept 2020

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like DB wasn't tailassing behind AB because she had enough time to get into her bedroom and remove her gun from a storage bin.

For starters why didn't she lock the door behind her, assuming it had a lock?

Was the layout of the house ever shown?
Maybe there was another exit besides the door that AB claims that DB had blocked?
 
Yes layout was shown. To the left there was a garage and you could enter the house through the laundry room from the garage, down a hall from that were AB's and her daughter's bedrooms. To the right was the main living area and front door. So def 2 entrances to the house. Probably a back patio slider, as well.
 
I’m a bit behind on the feed. The defense has some nerve trying to introduce that former ADA’s testimony. And I’m now at Amy Carlton and I don’t even know what the heck she’s talking about. It feels like they just pulled someone off the street. JMO
 
I’m a bit behind on the feed. The defense has some nerve trying to introduce that former ADA’s testimony. And I’m now at Amy Carlton and I don’t even know what the heck she’s talking about. It feels like they just pulled someone off the street. JMO

The poor hard of hearing woman seemed to still be suffering and worried about her dog from hearing gunshots. JMOO
 
I have to say it makes me sick that these manipulative/calculating guilty defendant’s are taking advantage of a very important law/victory for abused women ——‘battered woman defense.’ What makes me even sicker is that these so-called experts come in and provide cover for guilty women who simply do not qualify under the ‘battered woman’ definition. It makes a mockery of the whole thing. It makes it seem like a get outta jail free card for bratty women!

JMO
 
Did the state prove the defendant was not justified in killing Douglas Benefield?
If the jury feels the state did not prove their case against the defendant — they must acquit.

The defendant’s earlier testimony(only a few) which stood out as typical DV behavior:
-- Defendant apologized for the abuser’s behavior
-- Defendant blamed herself - explained walked on eggshells
-- Defends the abuser

Photos mean nothing - - people hide behind their smiles, they hid behind their closed doors.
No one really knows what goes on behind closed doors.

Prosecutor case is weak
Defendant stood firm while on cross by the Prosecutor (posting this comment early, crossing is still happening)


What is missing, maybe I missed the evidence:
Evidence of DB abuse toward (dog & cat) animals

Noticed: The defendant’s demeanor different depending on whether jury present or not.


On a side note: Feel bad for EB, for the loss of both of her parents. Hope she has much love and support in her life.


Finally prosecutor is bringing up the night DB was killed.

All just a matter of opinion.
BBM for the point I think we are both trying to make.

That cross examination was about 1 hour 30 minutes long in total. And out of that we got:

- 1 hour 10 minutes cross examination of a DV complainant
- 10 minutes cross examination of a murder defendant
- 10 minutes break for the witness to recover from a (real or fake) meltdown on the stand

JMO
 
I have to say it makes me sick that these manipulative/calculating guilty defendant’s are taking advantage of a very important law/victory for abused women ——‘battered woman defense.’ What makes me even sicker is that these so-called experts come in and provide cover for guilty women who simply do not qualify under the ‘battered woman’ definition. It makes a mockery of the whole thing. It makes it seem like a get outta jail free card for bratty women!

JMO
I agree with you: it is pretty disgusting---
 
Looks like DB wasn't tailassing behind AB because she had enough time to get into her bedroom and remove her gun from a storage bin.

For starters why didn't she lock the door behind her, assuming it had a lock?

Was the layout of the house ever shown?
Maybe there was another exit besides the door that AB claims that DB had blocked?
Respectfully and just imho:
Personally, if I was in a panic and fear of my life I probably wouldn't lock the door either. I'd get to my weapon to secure myself. It isn't a horror movie where one has no defense and locks the door to keep the bad guy out. The fact that he couldn't catch up to her, idk.
 
I had to turn it off.
This is like when you work a 9 to 5 office job and someone calls at 4:55PM on a Friday to have a conversation they know full well is going to last a considerable amount of time and probably annoy the hell out of whoever has to deal with your nonsense, but they do it anyway. I think there should be a special place in hell for people who inflict this sort of first world pain on people!

JMO
 
I had to turn it off.
IMO:
According to him just about everyone,female and male, who's been in a relationship could somehow fall under his guideline of being with a domestic abuser.

Question for all.
Did AB ever call LE at the time when DB shot a hole in the ceiling,knocked the dog unconscious or threw his gun at her and missed?

Or do they get a pass according to Ferris because they're afraid?
 
Respectfully and just imho:
Personally, if I was in a panic and fear of my life I probably wouldn't lock the door either. I'd get to my weapon to secure myself. It isn't a horror movie where one has no defense and locks the door to keep the bad guy out. The fact that he couldn't catch up to her, idk.
BBM:
Looks like that went right over the prosecutor's head and the house layout for a possible closer exit which wouldn't have involved a firearm.

Something about AB's timeline after she started running to her room I find questionable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
2,874
Total visitors
3,008

Forum statistics

Threads
603,194
Messages
18,153,323
Members
231,670
Latest member
xhononibb
Back
Top