LetsSolvIt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2021
- Messages
- 1,336
- Reaction score
- 14,945
If you haven’t seen, this is a fascinating analysis of WA‘s time with LE on 18 July 2014 — streamed three weeks ago on You Tube.
Second thing, to avoid talking to Danny, earlier in the week he was murdered WA had told him she had laryngitis but on the morning he was murdered, she told him that she was better and could talk about the boys’ school. But during the time at police station WA tells victims’ advocate that she and her friend Jane/Janine had taken a walk earlier that week and were discussing the post-divorce issues. Another disception!
Wendi Adelson Understands Why She Would Be a Suspect in her Ex-husband’s Murder | Roberta Glass: True Crime Report
Examining Wendi Adelson’s police questioning in her ex-husband, Dan Markel’s murder.
One thing I picked up in listening to the video again was that when LE found WA at lunch with her friends, they did not tell her why they were taking her to the station. During the five-plus hours she’s there, WA tells the detective and I think her friend Jane/Janine (in front of the victims advocate) she wondered during that car ride if they thought she was a suspect. To my recollection, they had not told her about Danny, or a shooting — it sounds like they were very vague. How did she come to the conclusion there was a crime to be a suspect in, unless she already knew there was a crime?Second thing, to avoid talking to Danny, earlier in the week he was murdered WA had told him she had laryngitis but on the morning he was murdered, she told him that she was better and could talk about the boys’ school. But during the time at police station WA tells victims’ advocate that she and her friend Jane/Janine had taken a walk earlier that week and were discussing the post-divorce issues. Another disception!
Last edited: