Interview with George's attorney Don West the day after the attempt on George's life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okhTnMothI0&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okhTnMothI0&feature=youtu.be
Does it say anywhere how these two just happened to meet up with each other? How did the shooter even know GZ was in town unless GZ went looking for this guy?
Who said GZ went looking for this guy?
That's what I'm asking...how did he even know GZ was in town?
That's what I'm asking...how did he even know GZ was in town?
That's what I'm asking...how did he even know GZ was in town?
This is what GZ said during his last encounter with MA in 2014...not this incident now in 2015:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...r-road-rage-incident-police-article-1.1937738
This was when he had his dental assistant girlfriend working there.
Possibly what's happening is that GZ is back with his ex-girlfriend who accused him of DV and that he was visiting a doctor's office not that he had an actual medical appointment but instead to see her. However, even if that's the case given how he knows MA works right there apparently practically right next door to where she is and he's had two prior run-ins with MA in that specific area where MA works, he'd instead meet his on-again-off-again GF elsewhere besides at her work right by where he's bound to run into MA where he's already had problems twice for that. To me GZ being back with his ex would be an explanation that would put his actions in the best legal light, though that would be a rather long-distance relationship and still not be the best judgment on his part even if his actions were fully legal.
I think MA has become paranoid and obsessed with GZ and every time he sees him he thinks its because of him.
But what does alarm me is MA not only had one gun in his vehicle, but he had two large caliber handguns. I think that is excessive. I don't know of anyone who carries two weapons in their vehicle for protection.
Also from the video I have seen MA comes across as odd as if he may have mental issues of some kind. I don't think his neighbor would lie about him harassing her since it scared her enough to call police.
He certainly was dangerous on the day he fired at GZs head.
Even if he is not charged and GZ isn't either concerning the shooting incident MA certainly does need to be charged with shooting a deadly weapon from his vehicle in a public area. IMO
"During a telephone call with a telephone canvasser from the University of Florida, Apperson suddenly said: 'I have a .357 Magnum and I am going to kill a trespasser.'"
Not telemarketer. Tresspasser. He told police he saw somebody in his backyard and he had problems with this person in the past. So wasn't a random person.Yet on that day with the canvasser no one was killed - let alone shot - and MA wasn't convicted of anything, let alone even charged or arrested. People have been known to use exaggerated words like saying they'll kill somebody to express their frustration, not because they're describing their premeditated murder plans to some random telemarketer, which indeed the telemarketer wasn't privy to murder plans.
Not telemarketer. Tresspasser. He told police he saw somebody in his backyard and he had problems with this person in the past. So wasn't a random person.
No, he wasn't on the phone with the trespasser, but instead he was on the phone with a random telemarketer and he indeed was not describing his murder plans to this random telemarketer.
I posted the article. He was on the phone with a telemarketer and he told this telemarketer he was going to kill a tresspasser.
Telemarketer became alarmed and called the police. Police investigated and Apperson told them he saw somebody in his backyard that he had problems with in the past.
So one guy shot at the other but you think the guy who was shot at and the guy who shot at him should be both charged with "reckless endangerment?"
I am not surprised Zimmerman is unemployed. Because of his notoriety, who is going to hire him?
I am beginning to wonder if MA has some type of paranoia going on.
From what I can tell in the first two MA claims GZ told the officers he was in the area shopping and produced a receipt which would have the time and date stamp on it and easy to verify, which I am sure LE did. The other one GZ said he had a doctor's visit/appointment in the area which was also easily provable and verifiable.
GZ, like it or not, he is a free man who has the same rights to go anywhere he pleases like anyone else does. MA did not have a
restraining order against GZ. He doesn't legally have to avoid any areas in the city. He is free to come and go as he pleases with no restrictions.
I think MA has become paranoid and obsessed with GZ and every time he sees him he thinks its because of him.
But what does alarm me is MA not only had one gun in his vehicle, but he had two large caliber handguns. I think that is excessive. I don't know of anyone who carries two weapons in their vehicle for protection. Also from the video I have seen MA comes across as odd as if he may have mental issues of some kind. I don't think his neighbor would lie about him harassing her since it scared her enough to call police.
He certainly was dangerous on the day he fired at GZs head. On this busy street its a wonder he didn't hit another innocent person or persons.
Even if he is not charged and GZ isn't either concerning the shooting incident MA certainly does need to be charged with shooting a deadly weapon from his vehicle in a public area. IMO