rubylulu19
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 181
Jen was 24 yrs old and abducted on the 24th , probably just coincidence but kinda weird
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
I have always thought if more than one person was involved in Jennifers disappearance why take her car at all? Why not take her in the vehicle that they used to get to the Mosaic? Why bring it back to within 1.2 miles of her condo?
Could it have been that the POI parked his car or bicycle near the Mosaic or the HOTG? Was he going to catch the bus near there?
Was the POI driving Jennifers car driving back to the Mosaic to meet up with another person(s) already there and the person(s) at the Mosaic called and told him not to come to the Mosaic? Perhaps if there was more than one person involved , they came back to her apartment to clean up or make sure that they did not leave something?
I don't think she was abducted in the traditional sense: I believe she was leaving for work - probably already at her car or driving away, when someone she knew flagged her down and asked for a ride. She knew this person well enough, and trusted them, so it wasn't an issue. When she dropped off this person, she was met with the actual abduction: Probably several men who overpowered her. They returned her car because they believe their location would be one police would search - therefore, they dumped it back into the local area in order to throw LE off her case. Personally, I think the suspect is literally right under our noses.
OK, going to throw something out there off the wall. I just got back from a cruise, and the cruise line gives you a luggage tag to attach to your bag(s) in which you fill out your name, address, and phone. What if someone from the cruise line abducted her? The outfit in the video could be a cruise line uniform. I know this is really reaching, but is it completely beyond the realm of possibility?
Sent from my LG-VS985 using Tapatalk
Not sure why I thought they took a cruise. Throw that theory out.Hi tricket, Jennifer flew to St Croix and back. No cruise.
I agree with much of what you mentioned.....We will never know what clues her condo may have held.....I have watched enough crime shows to know that just because a home looks pristine and from all visual indications that a crime was not committed there only to find out that there was indeed a crime there.......One show that I watched, the detectives and forensics requested a second look at the victims home as the first search revealed nothing.......The victims wife asked them to remove their shoes at the door as she had the first time that they were there....they looked around in every room......as one of the forensic techs was leaving the victims bedroom that was pristine nothing out of place, with her barefoot she stepped on a damp area........the carpet was pulled back revealing blood......
I am of the belief that Jennifer knew her abductor(statistically about 80% of victims do)....whether it was a casual acquaintance or someone she knew at work or socially I don't know...I just don't think it was a worker at the Mosaic...
I believe she was abducted from her apartment the night before right after her last phone call.....Jennifers mother said when they entered her apartment the day she went missing that it was "maid clean"....this has always stuck with me as on several interviews that I have listened to with her father, he describes Jennifer as somewhat of a slob, car and condo.....Her mother also said Jennifers mail was neatly stacked on her kitchen counter......I think that whoever abducted Jennifer came back to her condo and staged it......
No basis for much of my thoughts concerning Jennifer, I wish that I did know more facts as all of you do...
Longtime follower, first time commenter here... I never felt like I had anything to add, but Jennifer's disappearance always seemed so tragic and baffling. Keep checking online to see if anything changes. Maybe someday. Anyways... Here are my thoughts...
The person who took her car was not interested in the car or its contents, other than Jennifer. So the only reasons to take it are 1. Needed it for transportation or 2. It was parked in a location that would've been incriminating for the abductor. IMO, #1 makes the most sense if this was a random stranger, abducting her en route from her apartment to her car in the morning. #2 makes sense if she drove her car to a location of her own free will, something terrible happened, and the car needed to be moved.
Whether the truth is #1 or #2 is so tricky, because the evidence that we've heard seems so contradictory. She spoke to her (definitely not a suspect) boyfriend Monday 10ish, made no mention of plans to go out and said she was tired. Makeup was in the bathroom and the shower was wet, with nearby damp towel around noon the day she was reported missing. Looks like she "at least got out the door" for work.
Except that the Blink site, confirmed by Mr Kesse on the family's site, says that the phones (her phone & brother's friend's phone) pinged in undisclosed locations away from her apartment, before shuttling off due to "presumed removal of batteries." This happened around 10:40 the night before she was reported missing.
How strong is the science behind cell phone pinging? Has anyone ever seen an interview regarding to the cell phone pings? If it has been determined with scientific certainty that the cell phone left her apartment after 10 pm the night before she was reported missing, she must've gone someplace on purpose, in her vehicle. I make that jump to "on purpose" because of the makeup found in the bathroom.. It is often said that she must've gotten ready for work because of clothes on the bed, makeup in the bathroom, shower used, etc. IMO, that is all solid evidence that she got ready to go someplace, at some time, between returning home from work and vanishing.
For the record, I'm skeptical about the poi proposed on blink and other sites.
That's really about all... I really hope she is found. It is so sad...
I agree with much of what you mentioned.....We will never know what clues her condo may have held.....I have watched enough crime shows to know that just because a home looks pristine and from all visual indications that a crime was not committed there only to find out that there was indeed a crime there.......One show that I watched, the detectives and forensics requested a second look at the victims home as the first search revealed nothing.......The victims wife asked them to remove their shoes at the door as she had the first time that they were there....they looked around in every room......as one of the forensic techs was leaving the victims bedroom that was pristine nothing out of place, with her barefoot she stepped on a damp area........the carpet was pulled back revealing blood......
I am of the belief that Jennifer knew her abductor(statistically about 80% of victims do)....whether it was a casual acquaintance or someone she knew at work or socially I don't know...I just don't think it was a worker at the Mosaic...
I believe she was abducted from her apartment the night before right after her last phone call.....Jennifers mother said when they entered her apartment the day she went missing that it was "maid clean"....this has always stuck with me as on several interviews that I have listened to with her father, he describes Jennifer as somewhat of a slob, car and condo.....Her mother also said Jennifers mail was neatly stacked on her kitchen counter......I think that whoever abducted Jennifer came back to her condo and staged it......
No basis for much of my thoughts concerning Jennifer, I wish that I did know more facts as all of you do...