EVIDENCE - INTAKE VIA COLLECTION, SWORN STATMENTS, OR TESTING BY THE FBI IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME DISCOVERY BURDEN AS THE STATE. WHAT WE ALL WISH TO SEE, WE WILL NOT UNTIL TRIAL. HOWEVER, REMEMBER THAT AGENT SAVAGE TESTIFIED BEFORE THE GJ, AGAIN, NOT SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE TO THE DEFENSE.
If I were representing KC, I would be urging her to pursue a plea bargain.
JB is smart enough to know the forensics present here, in this document, would not have alone justified a GJ indictment on capital murder. He is walking into the shark tank with an open jugular, imo.
If I were him, I would assume that what the state presents at trial is going to seal a DP conviction for his Client. To my knowledge, his Co-counsel has 2 clients on Death Row, and 1 serving multiple LWOP.