I am not saying you have lied, but certainly someone who created these myths has lied as they are without basis. I do not think for a minute you personally have lied, I think you have seen them somewhere and belived the person dishing out the information.
I have taken your bullet points from above and pointed out when they are untrue or misrepresentative. A more detailed description is above though.
The inconsistencies of the statement of the Tapas Nine
Untrue, they are no suspicious inconsistencies
The refusal to engage in a reconstruction
Untrue, the McCanns never refused to take part.
The location of "cadaver" scent in the Renault hired days after Madeleines disappearance The location of "cadaver" scent in apartment 5a (the only location it was found in the entire resort) The alert of the dogs to cadaver on Kate McCanns clothing, a key fob, and behind the sofa in 5a
Misrepresentitive as the alerts do not mean cadaver scent was there as the dogs also alert to bodily fluids including dried blood from a living person. Untrue that these dogs searched the entire resort The reocvery dog only alerted to the card fob in the car, as did the csi dog (which only alerts to blood) the material on this was found to belong to Gerry
Swabs and DNA testing in the areas the dogs alerted showing positive results for elements of Madeleines DNA
Misrepresentitive. In one area in the flat the DNA was shown to possibly belong to either Gerry or madeleine. In the car the DNA identified was found to belong to gerry and Kate. Another sample of DNA was found to belong to three to five people and whilst it did contain elements that madeleine had in her DNA these exact same elements woudl be found in the dna of her parents, grandparents siblings and other relatives. It woudl be impossible to fnd a sample of kate and gerrys DNA that did not have madeleines elements in (in fact if a complete sample of gerry and kates dna was found it would ahve had 100% of madeleine's dna elements in it).
Gerry and Kates highly unusual move of securing a personal audience with the Pope, thereby leaving Portugal and abandoning the opportunity to be present when Madeleine is found
Untrue, there is no record of kate and gerry ever having had a perosnal audience with the Pope, nor any record that they secured the Popes brief visit to them in the crowd walk. He is the Pope, and was told there were two parents of a missing child there, why would he not go over to them and offer his prayers and bless madeleine's picture.
The use of Calpol for sedation in England, yet no medications whatsoever were found in 5a indicating a possible "clean up"
Untrue. calpol is not a sedative. There is no record of kate or gerry ever using sedatives on their child. kates father has never ever said they used calpol as a sedative.
Language used by both, specifically Kates unnatural refusal to call for lost child
Untrue, witness do state Kate was calling for madeleine.
Jane Tanners changing story
Untrue, she has never changed her story
The Smiths positively identifying Gerry McCann as the individual they saw carrying a child away from the resort
Untrue. The smiths never positively identified Gerry. Each one of them say they never saw the mans face. Several months after the event one of them said he did not see the man's face, it was dark, he did not have his glases, but that by a mannerism it may have been Gerry but he was not positive. None of the others smiths back this up, and several other witnesses inc staff state gerry was at the resort at that time. The PJ discunted it at the time.
The destruction of the childs toy (colouring book) to create a timeline they had yet to be asked for
Untrue as there is no record of the Mccanns doing this, not a record of what exact time the timeline was made (but in these cases it is most sensible to put a timeline of what happened when as soon as possible and not everyone takes writing paper on holiday with them)
The general appearance of both parents, Gerry especially seeming unnaturally jolly and unaffected (witness his blog)
Misrepresentitive as it is not a fact, and I for one have not observed this.
[/COLOR]The washing of "cuddle cat"
Misrepresentitive as this did not occur at a suspicious time i.e just before searches, and people in the UK do wash cuddly toys.
The laundering occuring on the evening of the 3rd while the parents were supposed to be distraught/searching
Untrue. There is no record of this happening
The refusal to be interviewed
Untrue they were interviewed.
The sheer carelessness and uncaringness of leaving small children alone to cry for extended periods of time, even though they knew this had been occuring and their children had experienced fear and trauma at being alone
Untrue as there is no record of the children crying for extended periods of time.
Kates claim the window had been forced open, but only her fingerprints were found
Untrue, other fingerpirnts were found, but remain unidentified.
The almost immediate engagement of a Public Relations team
Untrue, there is no record of the mccanns hiring a PR team at this time (orever for themselves). The ocean club used a spoeksperson and the FO sent one over. In the UK it is normal for the police to act as spokesmen for the family, but this does not happen in Portugal.
The unnaturally fast setting up of a private company to administer funds WITHOUT transparency
Untrue, given the millons they received very quickly they wer enot overly fast and the company has more transparency than the other option they had - keeping it in their own accounts.
The refusal to start a charity to administer the funds
Untrue. The mccanns did not refuse to set up a charity they are barred by the law from doing so. It woudl be against the 2006 charities act to set up a charity to find madeleine. If the charities commission had given them permission to do so the cahrities commission would have been prosecuted for breaking the law, they are not allowed to make exceptions. they regulate charities, they do not make charity law.
The use of the funds to pay lawyers, staff, personal expenses, and PR
Misrepresentitive. the fund has only paid its own legal expenses i.e those involved ins etting up the fund. they have never paid the mccanns own expenses this was paid by themselves, a donation from richard branson, and conditional fee arrangements. The only personal expenses were two mortgage payments that enabled them to stay in portugal in the summer of 2007. They have never hired their own staff or PR.
The disappearance of the bedding from the twins cots
Untrue, no record of this.
The provision of a pillow allegedly used by Madeleine, yet found with someone elses hair on it and NONE of Madeleines
Untrue there is no record of this.
The unexplained inconsistency of Paynes visit to Kate, as either 30 seconds or 30 minutes
Untrue, neither kate nor daid have ever said the visit took 30 minutes.
The unexplained inconsistency that Kate claimed to have a shower on the evening of the 3rd, followed by a bath a short time later
Untrue, there is no record of this.
The statement they could "see" apartment 5a from the Tapas restaurant, later proven to be false
Untrue, one could see the flat from where they were sat.
The first call Gerry made was to a friend in England, Alastair Clarke, a diplomat friend, BEFORE the PJ were informed
Untrue there is no record of this ad staff at the ocean club state they were bing asked to call the police very shortly after ten when the alarm was first raised.
Sky news were likewise informed, before LE
Untrue no record of this happening (see above)
The statement they were happy to take a LDT, only to refuse to take one a short time later
Untrue as there is no record of this and LDT are not normal in the UK and Portugal aside from chav TV (although five years after madeleine disappeared the UK is testing thier use in convicted sex offenders)
Attempts by Team McCann to steer the investigation, from Day one
Untrue, no record of this.
The complete absence of any forensic evidence of an intruder
Misrepresentitive as it just means the material found has been unable to be identified as belonging to any particular person who was not there. Undientified material and finerprints were found, but give it was a holiday rental it has been impossible to say where they came from.
The apparent politcal intereferance orchestrated by Team McCann, resulting in (amongst other things) the PDJ not receiving basic background information from the UK
Untrue, no record of this.
Indications that something "frozen" had escaped from the Renault trunk and dripped down to the pavement
Untrue, there is no record of this (and if the recovery dogs were so good one would have thought they might have alerted by the trunk which they did not).The political pressure began from the morning of the 4 May, when a British consul called the Portugese embassy to complain the PDJ were not "doing anything"
Misrepresentitive as in the EU it is normal for consuls to be involved. It is also not the case that the british consul in Portgal woudl call the Portuguese embassy which is obviously not in Portugal. They normally just have a representitive speak directly with the police.
Only the parents saw the "open window" that evening, even though it was a cold night and presumably draughty
Untrue when the rest of the party came into the flat they saw the open window, previous to this only kate had seen it was open and even then only when there was a breeze
Gerry inexplicably erased his call records from 3 May
untrue there is no record of this and gerry would not be able to delete call records from the company
Cadaver was located in 5a - there is a dead body unaccounted for, with confirmation that no third party died there.
Untrue. No cadaver was located, and cadaver dogs were never used. Only a recovery dog which its handler stated alerts to bodily fluids including dried blood from a living person, as well as actual cadavers. The dog indications do not prove a body is unaccounted for or that a person died there. It is a complete misinterpretation of the report to state otherwise.
Can i just ask where you get these snippets as they are no primary sources such as the PJ files stating these snippets are true, yet you see to be getting them from somewhere as I do not believe you personally are making them up? Is it from that anthony bennett's sites?