I'm not sure to whom the above is directed, but it doesn't remotely characterize my remarks about the lack of executive presence in Paris. Or the remarks described and quoted here:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/01/media-slam-obamas-paris-snub-200928.html
Is Andrea Mitchell a mewling critic?
In regard to Omaha Beach and D-Day, we can add the Hindu Kush and a host of other places to the mix, and say that the sailors and soldiers and Marines who shed their blood and lost their lives there were quintessential American warriors. Kunar Province really sticks in my mind. But we can't say politicians or governments are the same thing as the men who stood on those lines. And those places have nothing to do with whether or not this POTUS went to Paris. Nor do a President's relatives tell us a thing about a President's commitment to anything at all.
So, on the subject of the lack of American executive presence in Paris, judging from the thumbs down from members of the media seated on the left side of the aisle, tweets from Paris citizens, and the head-shaking from former officials who have served both Republican and Democrat presidents, it seems this was an equal opportunity failure. This is why Josh Earnest had a nerve-wracked day running damage control after the pulse of public and media sentiment was checked. To those then who say this has become political, I would ask what screams that louder than a Press Secy showing up with a mop and pail?