From your link:
IMO there's going to be tremendous pushback from homeschool coalitions that want to limit state interference. Without more info on the bill I don't know if it will cover the real problem anyway - removing a child from school who then "disappears," sometimes for years before it's reported.
The majority of state regulations on homeschooling contain no stipulation that the child must be physically seen - ever. Even required assessment tests that use neutral proctors can be done online.
Interestingly, Pennsylvania's Home School Statute states if a parent, guardian, or adult in the household has been convicted of certain criminal offenses in the past five years then the child cannot be homeschooled. PA also requires a yearly written evaluation conducted by a psychologist or other qualified person, implying they must actually see the child although it's not specifically written as such.
One policy recommendation from
CRHE is that portfolio evaluators should meet the student in person.
IMO it's the ease that allows abusive parents to make a child 'invisible' that is the core problem in cases we've seen here. This is all MOO and I'm trying to avoid a thread-derailing political discussion so I'm just gonna leave my opinion at that.