fred&edna
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 11,114
- Reaction score
- 63,461
I don't know. Maybe thrill is not the right word. Stabbing someone to death is killing, beheading is a whole other level.
On the TX case, there was no motive released yet on why the perp killed and cut off the victim's head. The victim and the perp were not known to each other. No money was taken out of the wallet so there was no robbery. Don't know what he did with the head. If he was just out to kill someone, he could have just stabbed him to death.
I don't know about the CA case because no one has been arrested yet and no suspect.
On the Dermond case, I don't get the reason why towels were used. Were the towels from the home or brought there? Could Mr Dermond have had the towels in his hands when he was accosted? If the body was midway in the garage between the two cars, the blood would have congealed before running out of the garage and they said it wasn't much blood there anyway. Did the towels prop up the neck for easy cutting? A hit-man wouldn't have bothered with any towels. What if the towels was used by the killer to kneel on? I wonder if they were able to get touch DNA off of the towels?
Thanks for info on the other decap cases.
And, good questions regarding the towels... especially as possible sources of evidence!