Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In my opinion he was shot, the murderers could have used a silencer but I really don't think they needed to, I think they knew no one was around.
near the COLLAR ....
Well, that's interesting. Was the point to extort the Dermond'sOne more thing, on the "closing statements" podcast, Holloway states that he and SS believe a gun was involved, also PH states that he believes the crime was extortion committed by 2 or more locals arriving/departing by boat, and they were unfamiliar with the interior of the Dermond home.
I follow all of this thinking except... the evidence to conclude the perps were unfamiliar with the home. Maybe it's unimportant but if so, why mention it?? 'Just to reiterate that family was not one of the perps??
was there a part 3 of the podcast I missed? can anyone share a link to the PH facebook page?
Well, that's interesting. Was the point to extort the Dermond's
kids?! And if so, how did they know about the Dermond's children?!
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Yes, I agree, but were these local yokels thinking they could pick up some money by extorting the kids or were they pros trying to extort or sending a message to the Dermond's kids? Meaning, did one of the Dermond children owe someone some $$$sMy take on the podcasts regarding extortion:
The perps were trying to extort $ from RD by taking SD from the home.
I think it's possible it was a relative staying with them who used their car and card to get into their gate (I don't know if their entry has a card to use). Maybe someone who stayed with them after their daughter left or came later, maybe picked up at the airport. I think this person asked them for money and was refused and got angry. That's my scenario, JMO
Sounds travels very well over lakes, not sure if anyone reported gunshots or not.
One more thing, on the "closing statements" podcast, Holloway states that he and SS believe a gun was involved, also PH states that he believes the crime was extortion committed by 2 or more locals arriving/departing by boat, and they were unfamiliar with the interior of the Dermond home.
I follow all of this thinking except... the evidence to conclude the perps were unfamiliar with the home. Maybe it's unimportant but if so, why mention it?? 'Just to reiterate that family was not one of the perps??
In my opinion he was shot, the murderers could have used a silencer but I really don't think they needed to, I think they knew no one was around.
was there a part 3 of the podcast I missed? can anyone share a link to the PH facebook page?
was there a part 3 of the podcast I missed? can anyone share a link to the PH facebook page?
I know both of them check out this thread so i'd really like to hear them explain the finger prints and fibers they found. I personally think PH and SS did this podcast to draw suspicion from the family who I am also sure checks out this thread. SS says he has the evidence but needs a witness. This tells me he knows who did it but the evidence can be contested because that person has been in the house before probably many times. There's no way the finger prints didn't come up In the system. Polygraphs can be beaten easily this whole podcast was a sham designed to keep us off track just like SS has done since day 1. Most of the podcast was building up SS as some super sleuth which he has yet to prove. Retire and lets get this case solved by a real detective