*Puts hand up* another who washes hair every day.
Ditto
*Puts hand up* another who washes hair every day.
Thanks for that. I saw the CM headline about a "slip up" but the link was going to a later article so i'd been wondering what it had been.
"Did you kill..." "Sorry"
how Freudian :facepalm:
Sorry, but who talks like this (BBM)?
Seriously.....talk about putting on a front. That's not natural speech.....it's like something out of a Bronte novel :facepalm:
And if he really does speak like this in real life - my god, no wonder she had to think about it. Please!!
Just by reading his stilted words I can tell he's emotionally disconnected!!:banghead:
Alright I am finally caught up!
I found GBC to be unbelievable on the stand. If I didn't despise him so much I would feel major second-hand embarrassment. What was the point of blathering on and on about their travels in such tedious detail? Whoever said its like being at a travel slide show without the slides was spot on.
I can imagine having an every day conversation with him would result in him finding every opportunity to slip in something about his travels. 'Oh yum GM this sandwich is so good'. 'You think that's good GG? Well when I was living in London - have I ever told you about that? - the Earl of Sandwich made me one! I had such a top notch job while we there, Allison didn't though'.
Well I think he was on Something ....
Ditto
Hi Neuromancer, I cant seem to find that fruedian "Sorry" slip up bit.
Can you copy that to here?
Sorry, I must be a "little bit thick"
Too much gerrymander stuff yesterday.
Sorry, it would have been coming up to our 15th, he corrected, cutting off his defence barrister, Michael Byrne QC.
Mr Byrne was already in the middle of his next question, which happened to be his biggest: Mr Baden-Clay, did you kill ?
Well when I was living in London - have I ever told you about that? - the Earl of Sandwich made me one! I had such a top notch job while we there, Allison didn't though'.
Some guy is on John Laws who is buying into the idea that Allison framed Gerard by committing suicide .. ACK!
IKR?
What about "we were working together to make that a reality after the infidelity I had in the past"
*shakes head*
He was trying to lose weight too. Maybe he was injecting what Allison was? What's the obvious thing that comes to mind if we think bodybuilders?
damn that makes me a little bit hurt
When it comes time for sentencing, after the verdict of guilty , this is a huge aggravating factor.. that Alison was, without doubt, murdered for the insurance payout.. out of Gerards own mouth, he didn't do it out of passion for poor old Toni..
Sorry if this has already been asked & answered but if GBC is found not guilty and the reasoning is that ABC could have committed suicide, does the insurance policy still pay out? If it doesn't then I'm surprised he'd go with this line of defense seeing as money was most probably his main motive.
Thing is: If Al was injecting wouldn't she have puncture marks on her body? If the did have serontin syndrome ( and managed a 14km walk and a bizarre rapid onset that suddenly killed her...) her body would of gone into hyperthermia. Surely her kidneys would show some sort of damage right?
She was suffering a cold (according to hairdresser) at the time. Do we know if she was taking any over the counter meds?
It's worth adding that in sociolinguistics, it's recognised that people slip into the passive voice when lying or trying to conceal something.
eg "I broke it" (active - the agent "I" is identified)
vs
"it got broken" (passive - no agent)
Exactly, Doc. Highly improbable, almost unbelievable. But then why would Gerard have chosen a Scout location of all places? Why somewhere that Allison's body might never have been found if he needed that insurance money? What I'm saying is ... NOTHING MAKES SENSE HERE.
Gerard isn't the first man to have affairs, to run into financial trouble, to be unhappy in his marriage, to be a complete and utter areshole protected by an understanding family. The murder part needs to be considered on its own merits (wrong word). It needs to be considered on its own. I am putting myself in the spot of the jury member here and thinking, okay, what if anything is possible? If he killed her, then how? Strangulation? No evidence. Blow to the head? No evidence. Suicide? Also, no evidence (except for the elevated Sertraline levels)
I'm just saying ... he's going to get off. After everything we've all debated and deconstructed and analysed and laughed over and cried over, he's going to get off. That's how I see things right now. I need to sleep.
IMO he was very familiar with that area and would have known that kayakers went in those creeks when the water level was high.Exactly, Doc. Highly improbable, almost unbelievable. But then why would Gerard have chosen a Scout location of all places? Why somewhere that Allison's body might never have been found if he needed that insurance money? What I'm saying is ... NOTHING MAKES SENSE HERE.
Gerard isn't the first man to have affairs, to run into financial trouble, to be unhappy in his marriage, to be a complete and utter areshole protected by an understanding family. The murder part needs to be considered on its own merits (wrong word). It needs to be considered on its own. I am putting myself in the spot of the jury member here and thinking, okay, what if anything is possible? If he killed her, then how? Strangulation? No evidence. Blow to the head? No evidence. Suicide? Also, no evidence (except for the elevated Sertraline levels)
I'm just saying ... he's going to get off. After everything we've all debated and deconstructed and analysed and laughed over and cried over, he's going to get off. That's how I see things right now. I need to sleep.