TorisMom003
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 4,386
- Reaction score
- 7
If true, that juror will have some thoughts on whether Zimmerman acted in compliance with CC regulations or did not IMO
Welcome!! :welcome:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If true, that juror will have some thoughts on whether Zimmerman acted in compliance with CC regulations or did not IMO
The backtracking on racial animus as a motive seemed to me to coincide with RJ's testimony about the racial epithets used by TM toward GZ. IMO
There is a better chance of me being able to sing like Elvis Presely then that juror voting to convict GZ.
There is a better chance of me being able to sing like Elvis Presely then that juror voting to convict GZ. IMO
Did the State bring in to evidence the neighborhood watch booklet that was provided to Zimmerman and other volunteers during their "training" meeting? I know that the City of Sanford has removed this booklet from their website before the trial began. TIA
IMO, the guy receiving a beat down would be the guy screaming for help and moaning in pain. As per JG's eye witness testimony, physician assistant's testimony, expert witness testimony, and photographic evidence, the guy who took a beating was GZ.
IMHO, they ran a focus group on the marijuana and were shocked at the results. Something they forgot to do before opening with a knock knock joke. Ouch! - All MOO.
I never understood her statement and/or story from the first time I heard it. I think she may have exaggerated a little bit. :twocents:
As per Dr Di Maio today- Trayvon could have been covered with bruises if he had survived- and we have no way of knowing. He died too quickly to bruise at all. So, no more talk about walking away unscathed (with a bullet in the heart).
All MOO.
The State used Ms. Lauer's ear witness testimony (along with other ear/eye witness testimony) to attempt to create a picture for the jury about what the state wants the jury to believe.
IMO, this animation is no different than what the state has tried to do, with the exception that it's been rendered in CGI.
IMO, I think this animation should be allowed, with an instruction to the jury. The jury is free to believe or disbelieve the state's version of events, just as they are free to believe or disbelieve the defense's version of events.
Don't forget he also testified for the defense in the Spector and Peterson trial. This was told to the jury today. Speaks volumes that he testified for those two <unusual people>
Our own KCL (Arias trial) had this "Dr." try to testify for her sister's killers..there was a huge CSI moment in her case, and this doctor looked ridiculous. Her story can be found in the Alexander/Arias thread. Quite interesting.
IMO - he's a paid <mod snip>.
Richard Hornsby said at the noon break on the "experts discussion on wesh" that the defense wouldn't dare put the THC evidence on because there are no or very few examples of the drug causing "aggression" and would be exactly the opposite.
We only have GZ's word for this, and he has changed his story many times. MOO
I was on vacation and missed him. Is it worth pulling up his testimony on youtube?
No it is not legally binding, however, it does point to Zimmerman not following directions. Since I can not link to the handbook anymore I can not give proof of this........the handbook said to not follow or confront or intervene, to call LE to report and then their job is done. The handbook also stated that guns were not to be carried while on their watch or "patrol", another reason I believe that Zimmerman changed his story from walking his "patrol" to going to the store.
MOO