lisasalinger
Juror13
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
- Messages
- 1,602
- Reaction score
- 14
If the evidence for the State's case is not there, you have to be fair. (I just made that up.) :blushing: MOO
lol, good morning Mrs. Cochran
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the evidence for the State's case is not there, you have to be fair. (I just made that up.) :blushing: MOO
i agree that he's starting off pretty slow. i have a feeling he will build up steam towards the end and have his strongest points towards the end. it kinda seems like he might be going over the law portion first. imo
I am not worried about the reaction of the people but the influence thinking about it may have on the jury.
I am only concerned about the jury feeling free to make the right decision, not the popular one.
I can not imagine what it feels like to be the last one talking for your client. The one whose words may help save him from prison for a long time or not...
He NEEDS to get to the point, to make a memorable statement. What I'm hearing is a lot of nothing. GET ON WITH IT, to the point, these people aren't stupid.
My belated thanks to MaHouston for posting GZ pictures at the police station, where he looked uninjured, and with a faint rectangle mark on his nose. The mention of recoil is also interesting. in the light of the faint mark
An INNOCENT teenager on his way home has been killed with nothing but a fruit drink and skittles on him. The grown man who shot him dead walked away free until the case caught national attention. The evidence showed no sign of GZ's DNA on TM, no eye witnesses, there were no medical documentation, yet we're asked to believe that TM had repeatedly punched GZ's face and smashed his head against concrete. The dead victim somehow became the villain....IMO
He's getting started now. How many 'could of been's have you heard from the state in this case'.
I think that his manner is easy to watch and that he is going to lead them softly..
I think he is doing a good thing.. Explaining what Reasonable doubt is and showing that it is the evidence not the filling in of the gaps that makes the case..
Not the facts in the case. TM was not shot for having skittles. He was not shot because he was walking home. He was shot because he was beating on a man in the dark and he shot him to defend his person.
The shopping at 7-11, the walking, the skittles have nothing what to do with the fact that TM is dead.
The facts are, He beat on GZ, and GZ shot him after being beaten up in the dark backed down on the sidewalked, No way to get away.
Morning everyone...
Praying for Justice for Trayvon!
Also praying for TM's family, GZ's family, the jurors, and the community to accept whatever verdict the jurors give.
I don't think the evidence was there for 2nd degree murder, so I'm hoping for a manslaughter conviction.