Geraldo: Now everybody hopes that it is not true but realistically, what are the chances that little Caylee Anthony, the Orlando, FL 3 year old, now three year old that has been missing for more than two months is still alive? Before we explore the possibility and get some surprising reaction from the cops, and I think surprising to Casey Anthony's attorney, Jose Baez. I want to begin asking that question of JB, he's the mother's attorney. He joins me from outside his client's home. Good to see you. Do you believe, Caylee Anthony, this child is alive and if you do, do you believe as apparently the grandma does, Cindy Anthony Does, that the child has been in some way, kidnapped?
JB: The answer to your first question is absolutely. We do believe she's alive. And we most importantly believe that the police should be out there looking for her and until they find her or give us proof otherwise, we're going to err on the side that she's alive and we really do believe she's alive.
Ger: But would you, Jose, and you know I respect you as an attorney, would you allow your client tonight talk to the authorities and tell the authorities really what went down to help them in their quest that we all want to be successfully concluded?
JB: Everything that - first of all, the police if they want to come and have access to my client, I have already given them an open invitation and this has been a long standing and I have willing to allow open communication between police and my client so long as it's in the search for Caylee. But the problem is here is that we don't feel that there is a sincere effort that actually searching for Caylee. All they are doing seems to be is prosecuting Casey and that is not the way a missing child case should be laid out. Ok, yes, I can understand the suspicion, however, they still have a missing child and there is no suspicion, they still have a missing child and this sets a bad precedent for the missing children to okay once you focus in on what you call a person of interest, even though you don't have any evidence, so lets just call off the search and let's see what can turn up at that point. That's not the way that things should be done.
GR: Now, Casey is obviously in the building, in the parents' home behind you. You spent 7 hours together on Friday. How are things going? Are you gleening any information out of her that could be helpful or are you, as some contend, concentrating on her defense charges?
JB: No, everything we're doing is towards the search for Caylee. What we are focusing in on is trying to backtrack that might assist us in finding her or finding those responsible of having her and passing that on to law enforcement.
GR: I want you to stand by because I have law enforcement coming up on the other side of the commercial break. I think you'll be surprised with some of what the captain of the police department has to say and maybe it's all rhetoric, maybe from both sides; I don't know; but there are....... Can we run the investigation?
Captain Nieves of the Orange County Sheriff's Department
GR: Captain Nieves, first of all, I have to ask you the big money question. Do you believe that this child is alive or dead?
CN: We believe she's alive. We're still working under the premise like we did the first day when we started this investigation. To look at all of the information that we are receiving, try and find the whereabouts of Caylee and establish her well-being. Of course, during that process, receiving the information that we have, from the initial reporter which was Casey, we have to follow the evidence where it leads us.
GR: Do you have any evidence that Caylee is alive? Other than what Casey told you?
CN: Well, at this point, we don't have any information provided to us that leads us to believe otherwise. We believe that she's still out there. That she can be found. If anyone provides us any information. But again, the information we're receiving, the evidence, the follow up that our detectives are conducting with the assistance of the FBI lab as long with the Federal Department of Law Enforcement and their crime analysis folks, receiving all of those tips of information, we have not been able to establish her well being.
GR: I really want to get this point nailed down. You not only believe that it's a possibility that she's alive, you're telling me that there is no evidence to the contrary?
CN: We're letting the evidence lead us to a conclusion. What we will continue to do is follow up on all of the information. Again, the sheriff's office will exhaust all means to try and make a determination as to where the child is, where she has been and again the key to that information is working with Casey. She is currently out on bond and we stand ready to receive any information that will help us on that end.
GR: Have you been frustrated by your relationship with the defendent in the child neglect case, Casey Anthony?
CN: It's definitely frustrating for our investigators. They put a lot of time, a lot of effort and will continue to do so. Again, we have the assistant of the the FBI Fed Dep of LE and again, we are standing ready as we were on day one to marshall anything that is necessary; any units, any personnel once we receive the information that will put us on the right track from Mr. Baez or Casey Anthony.
GR: As you sit there tonight, is there any plan to bring additional charges against Casey Anthony?
CN: Again, at this point, our detectives are continuing to look at everything. They're going to look at the entire picture. All of the information that has been provided to us and depending on where the evidence leads us, that will determined at a future date.
Talking Head Judge: Ok, number one, this is a department that has held it very close to the vest. They have not talked. They are out talking now. That tells me that the forensic anthropology that they expected to come back that would tell us the state of decomposition based upon the air in the trunk and whether the baby was actually dead didn't come back the way that they wanted it to. Number two, they're not quite sure that they have a homicide case. They don't want her to look like a suspect. But they're backtracking here and they're talking for the first time. Something's going on.
Talking Head Prosecutor: (In regards to taking it to trial on child neglect and not murder) Yes, they're going to be pushed on that issue. It's bad timing. They expected two weeks ago to have the goods, have the forensics back. They're in a tough spot. They didn't get enough so now they're recircling this thing, saying maybe we should reexamine what she's been saying from the beginning. But the campaign of disinformation from her hasn't helped at all. All lies.
GR: Jose, he referred to you very specifically, you know we hold you in high regard as an attorney. You got a defense to mount on lying to the authorities and child neglect. How are you going to balance that responsibility with the desperate need for your client to cooperate with the authorities to find this child, if the child exists?
JB: Well, we're going to do everything we can at the moment. And we're not going to sit back and take a reactive role like the police are. We're actually taking a proactive role and we're going out there and trying to find her. So we're trying to put all of the pieces of the puzzle together. It's difficult with all of the resources that we don't have that police have but we're not going to sit back and wait for tips to go follow up on them. We're going to go out there and try and follow up on them immediately rather than waiting for a month or so to go by before we actually talk to people who say they have spotted Caylee. It's very frustrating on our part but we are going to move forward the best we can. And quite frankly, that's all we can do.
GR: And you'll be on trial by January 9, 2009 according to the constitution of the state of FL. Leonard Padilla (and some pleasantries)
LP: I'm not a bail bondsman.
GR: As I talk to you, I'm going to show our exclusive interview that shows the tour of the RV (paraphrased). What happens to your money if Casey IS indicted for murder?
LP: That's not the problem. What we're in the process of doing right now is ordering a 2500 ping service. That will give us where she was every 2 minutes between the 16th, 17th, 18th, and 19th.
GR: How are you going to do that? How are you going to get that? What is that?
LP: You order it. You pay for the service, they give you the ping and it follows her cell phone every two minutes for the 5 days we are interested in. 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th. Okay? Just like the law enforcement pinged the airport, we're goign to ping her for 5 days except for when she was in bed asleep. It gives you a trail of who she met.
GR: Who's side is LP on, Jose?
LP: I'm on my side. I'm not on his side. He's a defense attorney. I can't even talk to his client. But it will give us the 5 peoples' activities who met with her. Amy, Ricardo, JP, her boyfriend and we will track the cell phone. Probably even to the pizza shop where she ordered the pizza on the night of the 19th. But we're interested in who was holding the child, where she dropped the child off until they got her up to where we believe is in New York (Can anyone else here this? Did he really say NY?)
GR: Makes sense to me Judge.
Argument here because LP was interrupted.
LP: They have 5 days to in which to bring her back or we're going to go out there and find the child actively.
GR: You are going to give Casey Anthony 5 days to bring the kid back or you are going to go after.........
LP: No, I don't care about her. The people who are holding her. They aren't holding her against her will. She knows who she passed the baby off too and it was a voluntary situation. Doesn't have anything to do with a kidnapping.
GR: Gotta go, gotta go, gotta go.