I do not think the arrest on the new lessor charges would violate the Big Bond. The behaviors that lead to the arrest occured prior to the bond. They were also generally known. It would be a different matter if the charges and behavior happened during the bond.
Lots of screwy info about this bond. Now they are mentioning a Texas co. involved in the revocation. Before in news reports they mentioned a Tampa bond co. and earlier mentioned another Florida city bond co. How many bond surety cos. are involved?
__________________
did you read this post?
Casey violated the conditions of her bond by being arrested on new charges. Perhaps Baez needs to learn to read (see 2.d.) since Financial Casualty and Surety clearly states in their Agreement for Surety Bail Bond the following:
2. It is understood and agreed that any one of the following actions by me shall constitute a breach of my obligations to
FC&S, and that FC&S and/or its Agent shall have the right to forthwith apprehend and surrender me in exoneration of my bail bond(s):
a. If I depart the jurisdiction of the Court without the written consent of the Court and FC&S, or its Agent.
b. If I shall move from one address to another or change my phone number without notifying FC&S, and/or its Agent.
c. If I commit any act, which shall constitute reasonable evidence of my intention to cause a forfeiture of my bail bond(s).
d. If I am arrested and incarcerated for any offense other than a minor traffic violation.
e. If I make any material false statement in my Bail Bond Application and Contract with FC&S.
______________________________
Yes, the police knew about the alligations of her stealing from Amy (and a few other crimes also) but she was not charged at the time. Now she has been charged, and it is a violation of her bond. It's very simple