ZaZara
AstraZaZara
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2014
- Messages
- 8,464
- Reaction score
- 18,234
on this point, the link i believe you are talking about says this...
"The investigators from Saxony-Anhalt now again intensified the possible involvement of the 43-year-old in the case. However, there was no evidence that this [person, i.e. CB] was near the crime scene"
(google english translate. my bold)
Fall Inga: Keine Hinweise auf Beteiligung von Christian B.
currently having no evidence of a person's presence, is different to them not being there. as i previously tried to explain.
maybe the google translate is incorrect. does he specifically exclude CB in his German quote?
you may have other reports that say 'the same prosecutor specifically excludes the involvement of Christian B in the disappearance of Inga'. i don't see these, but would be happy to read them.
what would specifically exclude CB...
if CB had a new alibi, or there was new evidence that CB was elsewhere, or if there was evidence that pointed to another person. i don't see any of that.
You expect the investigators to tell you everything? On the basis of what would they do that? Publish everything in the press about an ongoing investigation? IMHO this is not common police tactics anywhere and it certainly isn't so in Germany.
In Germany, a POI has a right to privacy, so even if they know where Christian B was on the day that Inga disappeared, they will only tell that he wasn't near the Wilhelmshof that day and not where in fact he was.
The alleged link between Christian B and the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was found during the investigation into the disappearance of Inga Gehricke. The investigations into the disappearance of Inga take place in silence and since German LE is following conversations of paedophiles in their search for Inga, it must be obvious that they consider abduction by a paedophile a serious option.
I hope that all this is equal attention enough for your liking. If not, I regret to inform that you cannot have it all.