***GUILTY*** Mark Sievers - 1st Degree Murder & Conspiracy

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I am curious about this investigator and the issue that Mummert says earlier that he is not working for him but now says he has worked for him in the past. Curiouser and curiouser....
 
MM said the JAC paid the guy this time
Two more for the "stories your mom wouldn't believe":

"But no, mom! I'm not paying the private investigator and videographer!" ( then admits the defense Justice Administrative Commission is paying for them)
Justice Administrative Commission

"We're videotaping because we're looking for a shady character" - while videotaping everyone...

Description was soon changed from shady character to "tall, slim, elderly man" - while still videotaping everyone...

.
 
Last edited:
Could someone explain to me how the jurors could rationalize convicting of a lesser included. In other words, it seems to me, in this case either Mark ordered the hot or he didn’t. It isn’t like he “didn’t mean” or accidentally promise CWW $100,000 to murder Teresa. What scenario could be used for 2nd degree or manslaughter?
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
194
Guests online
3,863
Total visitors
4,057

Forum statistics

Threads
602,883
Messages
18,148,330
Members
231,569
Latest member
Knewborn96
Back
Top