This doesn't really make sense to me. That is what she claims. But it doesn't make sense. If she has to give the gun to AB, then why leave it with Halls at all?None of which was down to her.
She told Dave Halls quite specifically that she needed to hand the gun to Baldwin and to call her back.
This was a case of other people ignoring the rules, not the armourer.
She was doing two jobs, one of which she wasn't contracted to do but this production was cheap. Maybe it just worked out easier to get the gun and leave it with Halls rather than having to go fetch it later and then go back to the Church with it?This doesn't really make sense to me. That is what she claims. But it doesn't make sense. If she has to give the gun to AB, then why leave it with Halls at all?
None of which was down to her.
She told Dave Halls quite specifically that she needed to hand the gun to Baldwin and to call her back.
This was a case of other people ignoring the rules, not the armourer.
It seems to that her statement she left it with Halls violated the rules as well. but keep in mind, the SAG rules are really just guidelines. Were they applicable on this set? It does not appear that even on Hollywood sets they were consistently enforced.She was doing two jobs, one of which she wasn't contracted to do but this production was cheap. Maybe it just worked out easier to get the gun and leave it with Halls rather than having to go fetch it later and then go back to the Church with it?
I don't know. It makes little difference though because she told Halls what she expected of him and stated that she had to hand it to Baldwin.
Yes, it's what she claims but I'm not hearing anyone refuting that. DH hasn't as far as I'm aware.
She was doing two jobs, one of which she wasn't contracted to do but this production was cheap. Maybe it just worked out easier to get the gun and leave it with Halls rather than having to go fetch it later and then go back to the Church with it?
I don't know. It makes little difference though because she told Halls what she expected of him and stated that she had to hand it to Baldwin.
Yes, it's what she claims but I'm not hearing anyone refuting that. DH hasn't as far as I'm aware.
I once saw a picture of her
(on this thread)
with a little girl who was holding a kind of rifle
It was on some film set.
Well,
it told me everything about this "armourer", cough, cough, that I needed to know about this person's professionalism
No further comments.
Justice for Halyna!!!!!!
I don't fully believe either one of them. Their tales are too self-serving. (Baldwin's too of course.)David Halls gives a different version from HGR, it came out in his OSHA deposition.
Dave Halls, ‘Rust’ Assistant Director, Gives Account of Shooting That Conflicts With Others’ Statements (EXCLUSIVE)
In a deposition, 'Rust' first A.D. Dave Halls said that no one person is responsible for Halyna Hutchins' death.variety.com
On Dec. 13, 2022, Halls participated in a Zoom deposition with attorneys from the New Mexico Occupational Health and Safety Bureau.
Halls has come in for harsh criticism for two actions just prior to the shooting. First, according to the widely reported narrative, Halls took the gun from Gutierrez Reed and handed it to Baldwin. (First A.D.s typically do not touch firearms on set.) Second, he declared it a “cold gun,” meaning it did not carry an explosive charge.
But in his deposition, Halls denied that he had done either of those things.
Halls testified that he checked the gun with Gutierrez Reed — as was their typical practice — and then she was the one who handed it directly to Baldwin.
He also said he did not announce that it was a “cold gun.”
“I don’t have any recollection of me saying that,” Halls said. “I have recollections of Hannah saying it.”
Halls’ version is at odds with Gutierrez Reed’s account, which she has given in police interviews and in her own OSHA deposition, which took place on Dec. 7. She has said that she handed the gun to Halls, and that Baldwin was not in the room when she walked out.
That deal smells to the high heavens.If HGR is going to claim that someone loaded a live round into the gun in between the time she gave it to DH and the shooting, the DA is going to have to explain why they quickly gave DH such a sweetheart deal.
We don't really know what the Prosecutors relied on to agree to that. I assume they believe him that it was HGR that handed the gun to AB. The current prosecutors may indeed wish that the deal hadn't been cut, but it was and they have to deal with it. But, in light of it, strategically, it makes sense for HGR's team to point the finger at him.That deal smells to the high heavens.
This doesn't really make sense to me. That is what she claims. But it doesn't make sense. If she has to give the gun to AB, then why leave it with Halls at all?
Agree. IIRC, she just left it laying on a table outside the church/set along with some other props, etc.This doesn't really make sense to me. That is what she claims. But it doesn't make sense. If she has to give the gun to AB, then why leave it with Halls at all?
correct. Either she is lying and she did leave it on the table, violation of SAG rules, or she handed it to Hall (violation of SAG rules) neither helps her. Or she did hand it AB herself. Or she is telling the truth in which case the prosecution gave the sweetheart deal to the wrong guy, which this completely dysfunctional prosecution is NOT about to admit.Agree. IIRC, she just left it laying on a table outside the church/set along with some other props, etc.
correct. Either she is lying and she did leave it on the table, violation of SAG rules, or she handed it to Hall (violation of SAG rules) neither helps her. Or she did hand it AB herself. Or she is telling the truth in which case the prosecution gave the sweetheart deal to the wrong guy, which this completely dysfunctional prosecution is NOT about to admit.
It doesn't help him but it sure doesn't hurt him, because he made his deal in the criminal case and I believe the civil case was settled. Plea deals are the way most cases are resolved and usually very appropriate. But in this case, the prosecutor (and I don't know which one it was) made this deal well ahead of knowing a lot of the facts. That shouldn't happen. But we are on the third configuration of prosecutors on this case. And it is still well off the rails. What is the State going to tell the jury? Who handed the gun to AB?And none of that helps her immediate supervisor (or the person who supervised both HGR and the props department).
AD was himself in a supervisory position (but HGR was not his direct report). He should have called HGR in and called her supervisor. Because one of his roles as AD is set safety.
When the Sheriff spokeperson looked into the camera on about day 10 of this tragedy and said "We know WHO put the ammunition in the gun," I think the DA must surely have listened. I thought it meant the obvious: that someone (HGR most likely) left DNA on the ammo - probably single source, plus also fingerprints. She goes on to say that they don't yet know the HOW of why that person (unnamed) had live ammo on the set.
Something like that. The AD could well have faced a lot of time (being a bit higher up the administrative chain plus...disobeying known protocols AND the rules of safe gun handling). He got busy and made a deal.
I do think it's very sad that making deals like this happens and it is definitely dysfunctional. Justice is not served with that procedure.
The State's biggest problem is going to be keeping him off the stand. What are the chances they can pull that off?It doesn't help him but it sure doesn't hurt him, because he made his deal in the criminal case and I believe the civil case was settled. Plea deals are the way most cases are resolved and usually very appropriate. But in this case, the prosecutor (and I don't know which one it was) made this deal well ahead of knowing a lot of the facts. That shouldn't happen. But we are on the third configuration of prosecutors on this case. And it is still well off the rails. What is the State going to tell the jury? Who handed the gun to AB?
Keeping who off the stand?The State's biggest problem is going to be keeping him off the stand. What are the chances they can pull that off?
Keeping who off the stand?
I think the AD will testify for AB.Keeping who off the stand?