It is a public street so the only people that could legally block it would be LE and after the judge's ruling today, I don't see that happening.
Some other people brought up the incident of Lee and the peaceful protester with the beautiful dog. Lee had already been told by LE that they could not make the lady move because she was not breaking any law nor was she trespassing. Lee did not like that answer so he pitched a hissy fit and took the law into his own hands by trying to destroy her sign and dumping the poor dog's water out while yaking about the rules of the HOA. What B**S**!.
When Cindy and George hammer in their "No Trespassing" signs in the ground and then string tape around the stretch of grass between the road and sidewalk they are basically doing the same thing because they have been told that it is a "public easement". What is it with this family that they seem to think that the law applies to everyone but THEM. Seems they only want the law enforced if it is going to benefit them....otherwise they ignore it. They scream about Casey's constitutional right to bail while at the same time they want the rights of protesters stopped. I really wish Lee had been charged with destroying personel property or something for what he did with that sign. His behavior that day is a prime example of why many in the public are FED UP with the Anthony's attitude! I am not the type of person to go to the Anthony's and protest but if that is what others want to do then so be it. I just wish that they would do it in a peaceful manner so as not to disturb the neighbors. Still, I wonder how many of those neighbors complaining about the protesters might also be the same neighbors that gladly took money from the various media groups for allowing them to set up their tents on their lawns.
JMO