Bodhi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 1,084
- Reaction score
- 4,510
A delay in reporting is actually commoner than you may think.
Something happens that seems to be illegal as all get out. The target or parent or sibling prevents it, the perp(s) drive off and the target is unharmed.
And then many innocent, good hearted people start questioning themselves. They don't want to believe that something bad may have almost happened to their loved one or they may question their interpretation of the event.
Or they don't want to believe that something bad could happen in their neighbourhood or while their kid is right under their eyes, etc. They may question if whatever happened was really reportable because even though it was scary, no real harm resulted.
So they delay and they often start seeking out other opinions. And eventually, as the shock of the event wears off, then they report it.
In reading about this phenomenon (I can't find the link, sorry) one article outlined the way the report is typically made in such circumstances. The reporter typically calls the LE business line and leads off with an apology for calling.
It was very interesting reading and I wish I could find the link again.
Thanks for your insightful post. You are so well-read, and your posts are very informative.
I thought the 3-hour delay was very odd. It made me doubt that the incident occurred as the father said or as the media reported. I also wondered what the possible reason for the delay could be.
The psychology of people's reactions makes sense! Something like the kidnapping attempt the father foiled would be so bizarre that it would seem kind of unreal for a while. It happened so quickly, then the kidnappers were gone, and everything around them is just as it was, as if nothing out of the ordinary ever happened. Like a Twilight Zone moment.
The part about witnesses calling the police later on the non-emergency line and starting out with an apology rings so true!