The story did seem to change but I found it interesting that the detail about being last seen with his bike was still included in his
NAMUS listing which has a "listing created" date of 6/3. It seems like LE would have a general idea by then whether or not he really was seen with his bike and would have reworded that or excluded the bike reference if they didn't think he was actually seen with it. Or is that not entirely unusual for the NAMUS details to reflect original reports - regardless of their accuracy,