Found Deceased ID - Joshua Vallow, 7, & Tylee Ryan, 17, Rexburg, Sept 2019 *mom arrested* #27

Status
Not open for further replies.
I really hope the ‘followers and friends’ do not put up the million so she cannot get out. IMO these people will loose their monies as she will skip and run far. The bond companies know this.
 
I really hope the ‘followers and friends’ do not put up the million so she cannot get out. IMO these people will loose their monies as she will skip and run far. The bond companies know this.
I would be very surprised if she stays. I can see her removing her ankle monitor and bouncing out. It’s not the first time she obstructs LE anyways.

MOO
 
I really hope the ‘followers and friends’ do not put up the million so she cannot get out. IMO these people will loose their monies as she will skip and run far. The bond companies know this.


I wonder if the bond companies might STILL refuse to cover her bond, even if the "followers and friends" DID put up the $1 million. They are not obligated to accept a bond, are they? I'm also wondering if Lori is surprised about this.
 
I'm happy to hear she's having trouble finding a bondsman to work with her. If the bond companies have followed this case at all they might be afraid of what we were talking about the other day.....that these two crazies will kill themselves.
If that’s the case the charges will be dropped and a win for the BB. Concern is absconding.
 
Well that would be a surprise! I think he wants to bail her out and would have already if he could. I believe Chad doesn't have the $ 1 Million collateral needed to secure the bond and he has probably been begging his supporters to either put up their homes or to pool their cash.

MOO.
Chad better watch his back if he can't bail her out he'll probably be next in the spouse murders. MOO
 
I had the same thought and read some confusing things but this is my take away. The bond is secured by some person. In this case it could be Chad, it could be Lori, it could be someone else. If Chad secures the bond to free Lori and Lori dies by any means before her next court date, Chad gets his money back. If Chad secures the bond and both Chad and Lori die before the next court date the bond becomes part of Chad's estate and his heirs can get that money back. If Chad secures the bond in Lori's name and she dies her estate would get the money.

If the bond is secured through a bail bondsman they would keep 10% of the bond no matter what.

MOO
Ditto
 
Well that would be a surprise! I think he wants to bail her out and would have already if he could. I believe Chad doesn't have the $ 1 Million collateral needed to secure the bond and he has probably been begging his supporters to either put up their homes or to pool their cash.

MOO.

Who in their right mind would put up their own cash, home or other assets for Lori Daybell and lose it all without absolute 100% proof (and I'm talking like in-person viewing with my own two eyes proof) that these children are alive?? Obviously, no one has stepped up...

As always, MOO....<<< Saying this always makes me feel like I need to chew cud and be put out to pasture ;)
 
I wonder who he turned to for collateral? I don't see the AVOW folks taking a risk for Lori. His family likely can't raise enough. Does he have any close friends?

No one would put this up for Lori. Chad, I don't think that anyone will put up a dime for him if he gets arrested.

Pretty simple, Lori has said that her children are "safe". So, bring them in, get out of jail. Otherwise, enjoy the hospitality of the city of Rexburg.
 
No way, no shape, no how would I do that. But I'm mean, I plain don't bail anyone out of jail. Jmo
I don't think it's going to happen. Who in their right mind would put up their home or other assets for this woman just so she can continue to be in contempt of court and not produce her kids? It's like aiding and abetting her even further.
 
I don't think it's going to happen. Who in their right mind would put up their home or other assets for this woman just so she can continue to be in contempt of court and not produce her kids? It's like aiding and abetting her even further.

The fact that she blew off a prior court appearance is not in her favor.
 
During the 2007 cricket world cup, Bob Woolmer, Pakistan's coach, was found dead in his hotel room. The day before, Pakistan had lost, sensationally, to Ireland. These were the two facts everyone agreed on.

The news cycle didn't play out so quickly in 2007, and it took four days for the cause of death to go from "probable heart attack" to "suicide" to "murder." There were multiple theories about the identity of the murderer.

The most popular was that Woolmer had been accepting money to throw matches, and criminal betting syndicates had ordered his murder to keep him quiet. But there were many other theories. One was that he had been killed because he was an atheist and, as such, a terrible and blasphemous fit for Pakistan's team of devout Muslims. Another was more personal: he had been killed because the Pakistani team captain didn't like him. This last gained some traction because of some inconsistencies in the captain's statements.

As Guardian reporter Mark Townsend wrote a few months after Woolmer's death, it was a time when it felt like "anyone might have murdered" him because "there were many who wanted him dead." It was also a time, Townsend wrote, when "fact became rumor" and "rumor became fact."

Amidst all the drama and all the intrigue, the only explanation that seemed truly implausible was that Woolmer had died from natural causes. And yet . . .

That implausible explanation was the correct one. Three months after Woolmer died, a thorough autopsy revealed that there was no murder and no suicide. Woolmer, a diabetic with high blood pressure, had indeed died from natural causes.

*

This case is so crazy that it seems absurd to entertain ordinary explanations for any of it. But if we ever know what really happened, we will inevitably learn that some of the things that seemed so suspicious really weren't. We will discover coincidences that seem impossible now, but that's what they'll be. Alex's death may fall into this category. Tammy's might, too. Alex might really have shot Charles in self-defense. And this is the big stuff.

The little stuff is even easier to imagine as meaningless. Lori's courtroom smirk might be the product of nothing more than nerves. Same with her laugh after returning to the house where her brother had just shot her husband. And who knows what "That's great" means? My point is that none of these things are inherently suspicious in and of themselves. It's only when we look through the prism of presumed guilt that every one of them turns sinister.

In the absence of proof, I think it's worth looking at the things that are strange and disturbing, however you slice and dice them. One is Chad's hasty remarriage after his wife of decades died suddenly. This is off. At a minimum, it is evidence of an inappropriate and unacknowledged relationship with Lori that overlapped with his marriage to Tammy. Another thing that is just off is Chad telling LE that he didn't know Lori (now his wife) very well and didn't have her phone number. This is a seemingly trivial detail, but it reveals how desperate he was to mislead the police. It was the action of a man who has something serious to hide. All the lies Chad and Lori told about the whereabouts and even the existence of Tylee and JJ are also things that I don't think you can explain away. In my view, there is no plausible explanation for these lies that isn't extremely disturbing.

There is one incident that has haunted me from the first time I read about it, and I haven't put it in either of the above categories. And that's the "attack" (?) on Tammy by the man (?) with a paint gun (?) just days before her shocking death. On the one hand, it would seem like a pretty clear-cut case of something that was probably sinister but not necessarily (it could have been a prank). But the remoteness of the Daybell house and the absence of any reports of similar pranks in the neighborhood make me wonder if perhaps it should go into that second category: things for which there can be no innocent explanation.

I don't know. But either way, I feel like if we knew who that paint gun shooter was, then the rest of the case would come into view and long-protected secrets would at last be revealed.

MOO
 
The Sun has learned that Lori has put together the $100,000 she will need to put down herself, but is having trouble proving that she has $1 million in assets.
Well, we’ve known Chad has that in his pocket, and perhaps they thought they could Sweet talk some BB to overlook the need for $1m in RE.

“Nahhhh”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Keep Websleuths Free

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
136
Guests online
608
Total visitors
744

Forum statistics

Threads
616,941
Messages
18,359,538
Members
237,339
Latest member
mtmama707
Back
Top