Inthedetails
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 26,198
- Reaction score
- 163,622
Point 1
My guess would be that during the initial appearance of suspect #2, (the unknown suspect), his lawyer asked that all records be sealed to insure his client was guaranteed a fair trail. Some judge was dumb enough to sign off on it and the prosecutor apparently didn't object, so sealed it was. That may be the main reason why they aren't identifying suspect #2, legal gamesmanship being perpetrated inside of a kangaroo court. There really isn't any good reason why this person hasn't been identified, which includes gender, age, and the extent involved.
Point 2
We all know that the timeline seems pretty funky and confusing. Bo leaves at 7 p.m.----first ATM robbed at 8:34 p.m. Now that I've watched the ridiculous procedures that have been put into play by the "system", I have no doubt that the two perpetrators most likely went on a spending spree with Bo's money. We've only heard about one debit card and pin #, but they may have stolen numerous cards from him and used them elsewhere. I imagine the two videos that were put out for the public to see are the tip of the iceberg, and that a huge amount of electronic evidence as well as video footage has been suppressed and hidden from public view. If the people in charge will hide the name of the suspect of all things, then the sky is the limit on what other information they will suppress and keep under wraps, which would include all of the places these two pukes may have gone in an attempt to buy things and purchase things using Bo's cards. If that additional information was known, then the timeline would most likely make perfect sense and their movements that day would be easy to track. We aren't going to hear about or see that evidence for a long time though, so do the best you can to piece it together with what we do have.
Hmm.... spending spree might have continued after the car was torched, not necessarily within the timeline of 7pm to finding the car.
jmo