Spellbound
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 19,026
- Reaction score
- 37,318
I substantially agree with you, I guess that's why the hotel policy is to only examine surveillance if it's a police request. The problem is, police didn't want to deal with it. Why would a woman go missing without her phone or her mother's car keys? And her friends said she was with them, then somehow wandered off extremely drunk, not that she was last seen for eg, talking to a guy she'd met in the bar. That situation, to me, raises alarm bells about her welfare and is worth a check by police.
Well, I remember being young (before cell phones, though) and not always wanting our family or sometimes even our friends to know where we had been or with whom, or what we did in detail. LE may have assumed it was possible this "young adult lady" went off to be with a guy and did not plan to disappear or worry anyone. I can see me leaving a purse behind if I didn't need it while I was off doing "whatever". I can imagine friends not telling all they knew if they were trying to stay out of trouble themselves ( ex. if any knew she had gone off with someone or if drugs were involved, etc.-- which is just speculation and not one I am bound to ).
Without video showing how she left the apartment, if she left alone or with friends, it is hard to determine much about her movements at that point. Alone or with someone?
If the Chicago Tribune timeline is correct, she was reported missing to police after @ 7am, and family was told they could not make a missing person report that soon (my paraphrase) --- which is not at all unusual. [from Michigan State Police, where I live, it is USA.ly 24 - 72 hours http://www.michigan.gov/msp/0,4643,7-123-1878_32000-299532--,00.html ]
a search was begin @ 1:15 pm (was this by LE and hotel staff?). Six hours isn't really very long with an adult missing case, in fact it is quicker than most. However, I think a big part of the problem here is that the girl was barely 18, bordering on being a juvenile still, and they followed adult procedures.
LE finally looked at the tapes again after @6pm or later; she was seen on the tape @ 10 pm . Her body was found @ 12:30 am.
From first report @ 7 am (estimate) to 12:30 am discovery of body the next day = 17 1/2 hours. I think LE really acted properly, and perhaps even faster than they would for many missing adult cases, and not bad for a juvenile missing, either. If I were a family member, I am sure I would never think it was good enough or fast enough ... but as an outsider I think they did well. I do not think they "didn't want to deal with it," but were hampered by protocol. Could they have made an exception? perhaps.
JMO
see Chicago Tribune timeline in my post #555 above