It's good to see such a large crowd coming out to support Yingying.
Even if there were no other evidence found, I think a jury would convict on the kidnapping charge, based on his admission that he picked her up, and then whatever the audio turns out to be. It's so blindingly obvious what his intentions were and what must have happened, and juries want justice, not to let someone off because of some very unlikely scenario that might possibly have happened. For example, if she had panicked in the car and he had let her out, what's the likelihood she wouldn't immediately use her phone, they must have evidence about it. Or the likelihood she'd trust yet another stranger.
And with the audio recording, he was a PhD candidate in physics, not mentally challenged, or a compulsive liar, or otherwise someone who doesn't know the difference between fantasy and reality. People have been convicted when they admitted their crime to a jailhouse cellmate, in this case they have his actual words. I think the standards of justice demand that when the prime suspect admits, without coercion, that he did in fact commit the crime, the system is going to take him at his word!
Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk