Andreee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2018
- Messages
- 3,459
- Reaction score
- 15,511
Including then!I meant at the time of the murders. Sorry for any confusion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Including then!I meant at the time of the murders. Sorry for any confusion.
I totally agree with you its awful, however, sadly the photos speak words unfortunately. Sadly those are the words of the victim IMO. Juries,judges, prosecutors, lawyers who are in the courtroom viewing the photos will empathize with the victim so its extremely important for that reason, obviously not that these people don't already, but the visual unfortunately is very powerful to get the victim's side out there to convict the perp if there's any doubt it just builds on the evidence presented already. It is a horrible experience I'm sure, sadly and I feel for those who are brave enough to stay (friends and family.) It must be excruciating. So very sad.MissMalowe
Thank you very much for your very thoughtful response.
I understand your interest and realize I reached past the immediate topic and down the rabbit hole a bit.
Let me please answer to this and put it into proper context for you.
I see this looks to you like I went against my own statement but it’s not that simple.
My friend was murdered in her very early 20s. It was horrific and traumatic and there were no answers for decades so many prayers went into this and then I petitioned to police to check into the case and the most incredible and competent detectives in a well-funded department were able to run well preserved DNA from the crime scene through CODIS and there was a hit.
It was a miracle and an answer to prayer and the result of the most amazing work by true professionals.
But I will tell you that I honestly and thoroughly advocated for my friend. I told the detective about how many years so many of us had suffered without answers.
I asked the detective what needed to be done and I listened and then I asked the detective to please prioritize this case and I followed up.
This was all quite a few years ago when it was much more expensive and less commonplace so it was all very miraculous to put a face on our monster with a DNA “hit”.
Detectives assured me that upon arrest the perp was not remorseful, not cooperative and he pleaded non guilty despite all the evidence against him. He had no empathy toward the victim, and was only self-consumed.
After many more months there was a trial.
One day, after many days (weeks even) of uninterruptedly attending the criminal trial and with no prior warning, I was told by either my friend’s family or someone from the DAs office that I may want to leave the courtroom for a few hours as I may find some pictorial evidence disturbing. I was surprised to see all of my friend’s family members were leaving but I made an immediate decision to stay because I felt extremely vested in the case and I felt that if all my friend’s family members were leaving then who would be there that was an advocate for my friend among a roomful of strangers.
I had no earthly idea that full nude photos of my deceased friend would be shown on a big screen.
I didn’t get that memo!
I will reiterate my humble opinion that THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER THAT ANYONE OTHER THAN POLICE DETECTIVES, FBI AGENTS, THE DA AND STAFF, THE JUDGE, THE JURY, THE DEFENDANT AND HIS COUNSEL should be privy to photos like this.
You or I wouldn’t want our naked body on full display of strangers who happen to show up in a courtroom someday. A victim should be protected from private photos being shown in the public confines of an open courtroom with a larger than life BIG SCREEN hanging from the wall.
It is simply wrong, indecent and unnecessary. It is a gross invasion of privacy and being a victim should not mean that you are re-victimized by being put on public display.
It is quite literally being stripped of your dignity.
Imho there should be a line firmly drawn.
There was absolutely no reason that I needed to see that or that the members of the press that were present needed to see that or that the voyeurs who made their way into the courtroom that day needed to see that.
It is a matter of decency, decorum, tastefulness and ethics.
THE SYSTEM LET ME DOWN AND IT LET MY FRIEND DOWN and it was shameful.
I was told that often these images are kept private in trials.
I don’t know if this is the judge making this decision or the DA- I’m not trained in the law- but KUDOS to the powers that be that choose to protect our victims in this way.
It is something that has grated on me for years and there must be a way to change the laws to better preserve the dignity of a victim and of course those living- the family and friends of a victim- should be protected from this violation of privacy as well.
It is an indescribable feeling of violation and ickiness that most of us (thankfully) will never have to suffer.
I bring this up because I feel it pertains directly to Abby & Libby’s case.
Praying that their dignity and their privacy will be conscientiously preserved.
They can redact info that is pertinant to the investigation since it is very serious that the judge fears for his safety and my question is why is that so. This is an official we are talking about the fact that he fears for his and his family's safety is VERY concerning IMO. I feel perhaps this case may be related to a bigger picture than what is being presented on the surface and perhaps the authorities know this and don't want to alarm the public.Couldn’t have said it better. Thank you so much. The Indiana establishment needs to stop clinging on to this in the way they have.
Q In your professional opinion, would you describe the deaths of the six females as “planned”?I think this is one of those rare cases where the article is wrong. Whoever wrote it probably is not that familiar with the case and leaped to a wrong conclusion based on the RL warrant.
Here is Leazenby answering a direct question about if the girls were killed somewhere else:
Question. Has it been determined the girls were killed where they were found?
Answer. Based on information known, yes.
Source: County Sheriff answers double homicide questions from readers - Carroll County Comet
The article is taking the words moved and staged out of context, that's all. Moved Just means that they were not located where the act took place. This could be as little as a couple of feet. Keep in mind, when the PD is investigating a murder, they are looking at patterns. We've all seen detective shows, where they are using string to decipher which direction a bullet came from, or blood spatter, etc. They use pooling blood, drag marks etc. It only means that they were moved from where the incident happened specifically, not that they were moved from an entire other location.May I ask a quick question? I've only been following this case sporadically, but I was under the impression that everything happened where the girls were found. However, this article from 10/31/22 states:
"... Abby and Libby are believed to have been killed in another location, before their murderer then moved their bodies to where they were found, the surfaced documents show. ..."
Am I mistaken about everything happening "on site"?
Thanks! (Hopefully Yahoo is an approved source. If it's not, my sincere apologies. Is there a list of approved sources somewhere, for future reference? I looked and looked, but didn't find one.)
They can redact info that is pertinant to the investigation since it is very serious that the judge fears for his safety and my question is why is that so. This is an official we are talking about the fact that he fears for his and his family's safety is VERY concerning IMO. I feel perhaps this case may be related to a bigger picture than what is being presented on the surface and perhaps the authorities know this and don't want to alarm the public.
The judge was bombarded with demands to release info from the PUBLIC. He was not in fear of RA, or any associates. The public outrage of the the documents being sealed. His phone, including his home phone, has probably rang off the hook around the clock since the news came out that they were not releasing any details. It's no big conspiracy, just a small town judge with a small staff, getting hammered by armchair legal experts. As much as our curiosity dictates that we are all a little nosey, people should just let the system take it's course.They can redact info that is pertinant to the investigation since it is very serious that the judge fears for his safety and my question is why is that so. This is an official we are talking about the fact that he fears for his and his family's safety is VERY concerning IMO. I feel perhaps this case may be related to a bigger picture than what is being presented on the surface and perhaps the authorities know this and don't want to alarm the public.
I very much hope that LE is continually reminding him of his right to remain silent and to have the presence of an attorney. We don't want anything questioned or thrown out at trial, so let him sit there and not cooperate. Jmo.Re RA "not cooperating...".
I would be surprised if he confessed right away.
If there is death penalty involved, he might wait for an offer to take it off.
I guess it all depends on the evidence Police got.
Maybe he hopes the evidence is weak?
If it is 100% linking him to the murders (DNA), then his pleading not guilty does not matter.
I think the Prosecution is under immense pressure due to public attention to this horrifying case.
Moo
He hasn't talked.Hello again!
Can someone provide a link to where he talks about waiting in a truck? I heard Tricia mention it and have seen talk about it online but I can’t find the original documentation on that. Thanks !
Then where did this information come from?He hasn't talked.
Are you maybe thinking of KAK (the CSAM case) saying he was waiting in a Jeep? That came from the Murder Sheet podcast, who said a "source" told them that this is what KAK had told LE.Then where did this information come from?
Yes! I meant him. Need more coffee!Are you maybe thinking of KAK (the CSAM case) saying he was waiting in a Jeep? That came from the Murder Sheet podcast, who said a "source" told them that this is what KAK had told LE.