The Unspent Bullet/Round Bothers Me!
This is why
Presuming the girls were already incapacitated or deceased having been forced down the hill and across a creek by someone presumably pointing a gun at them.
Why would the perpetrator find the need to *advertiser censored*, and cycle his weapon at all? Having got them to the Murder site by just pointing the weapon.
I would have expected any cocking or cycling unspent bullets to occur at the beginning of the girl's ordeal at the South East end of the bridge. The fear element
This Guy must have been a frigging juggling nija.
- Control two girls down a steep hill
- With a gun in his hand
- Whilst navigating the same steep hill himself
- Crossing the same creek
- Getting them up an embankment which he himself has to do (One handed) because he presumably still has the gun in his hand pointing at the girls.
- Then to top it all kill both of the girls with a bladed weapon as per RL (PCA) and they had no obvious signs of a struggle.
- So he swapped the gun for a bladed weapon!
- HOW?
This in my amateur speculative mode leads me to wonder about the following
- As sure as hell swapping from pointing a gun to killing two girls with a bladed object whilst cycling/cocking a gun and dropping an unspent round takes some dexterity.
I am on the side of justice for Libby & Abby. I want their justice to be for the right reasons with the right person/people being held accountable for the right reasons no matter what their involvement.
The Unspent Bullett/Round it’s reported proximity to the bodies irritates me.
I think the word Actor was a very careful word from the prosecution
As always be kind to each other and respect each other's thoughts
SIJ