I probably didn’t have commas where they belonged. On 2-14 at 9a he asked for an alibi for the time frame they were killed during, hours before their bodies were found.
I’m on way north indiana and yeah, I remember wearing a hoodie and jeans to work in a factory that day and I was sweltering hot all day. Anyone wearing a heavy coat and all bundled up like BG would stand out as being overdressed.
I don’t quite understand how anyone can assume that the unspent round is all the physical evidence le has? It truly baffles me; le has played everything extremely close to the chest all along. Why on earth would they throw their whole case away now by making an arrest and preparing to go to trial with something so obviously flimsy? I suspect the bullet evidence we all are so focused on will be minimized greatly at trial. Le just revealed, again, the bare minimum to get them to the next goalpost, which is endgame now: trial or guilty plea with confession.
Honestly, I think most people just don't know how the just system works in the States.
He wasn't avoiding a DUI with that alibi, he was avoiding a lengthy sentence that would stem from driving without a license from chronic DUIs - big difference. Lying to police isn't as rare as many people seem to think.
RL asks for the alibi at 9:20 a.m. on the 14th, according to the affidavit. By then, he knows they are missing overnight and the search has restarted. He had to know he'd face scrutiny. Based on it being on his property, my thought is thqt RL probably knows both about the search and the deaths before others even if he is uninvolved. The thing that doesn't make sense about RL is the 2:09 phone call mentioned in Section 22 of the PCA. Libby takes a picture of Abby between the second and third platforms at 2:07. She starts the video at 2:13. The video is 43 seconds according to the Allen PCA, and BG. The bridge is 850ish feet and the videos out there seem to suggest it takes 3.5 to 4 minutes at a minimum to cross while walking. So, the math would be mighty tight unless BG was on the phone walking across the bridge
I believe also that he knew they were going to be there.
Except he didn't try to cover his butt from a lengthy sentence when he drove to the transfer station that morning before things went down. He only asked his cousin to lie for him starting between 2:00 - 2:30 when the murders went down. You'd think he'd want to cover his butt each and every time he drove without a license, yet he only did that when things went down on that particular day.
KAK does NOT have his own separate thread, to my knowledge.
He does. One of the Mods pointed us to it a while back. We've had some chatter here about that. Some prefer us to talk about KAK only on his thread, some of us (like me) prefer to talk about KAK here if it seems to have anything to do with the Delphi murders.
www.websleuths.com
I think the point @TL4S is making is not one of certainty but one probability. What are odds he lands at the bridge right before them, has just enough time to stare across it and make sure no one is on the other side, hide and then kidnap them on the other end of the bridge. If BG had been minutes later there would been no opportunity to scope the bridge and hide. "Guess he's just lucky" could be an option but that requires him randomly noticing no one is on the south end of the bridge and randomly concealing himself since he wasn't in front of them and was not in Libby's photo of Abby. It requires absolute luck or total recklessness for it to be otherwise. Always a possibility. But what's the probability?
Your 2nd, 3rd & 4th links (the 3 in the middle) all get this: "Oops, This Page Could Not Be Found!"
