Thanks for putting on another hat for a moment.
IMO - We're seeing an argument develop to answer Defense's non-choices on Oct 19th. Defense didn't appear for hearing in open court b/c they were ambushed and Gull frosted the ambush with "openness" of a TV show for this particular hearing,
while keeping so many other records hidden from the public.
IMO Some new things to note:
- the Defense notified the Court of the Leak immediately upon learning about it
- the Prosecution - and not Gull - first demanded the removal of the Defense due to the Leak,
- that RA expressed his confidence in his Attorneys and understood about the Leak and the consequences and still very much wanted to keep his counsel, and
- that Gull's response was a decision to immediately satisfy Prosecution and without a hearing, STOP the Defense from working on RA's case.