MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,223
I expect your full analysis of Judge Gulls work on my desk by 9am
Haha I think you have me confused with somebody else!
I expect your full analysis of Judge Gulls work on my desk by 9am
My understanding is the phone was pinged at that time, but I have tried to find more info about it and what exactly it would mean for the phone to ping at that time.can someone shoot me a link to the phone pinging at 2:30 a.m.?
my understanding is that LE LEARNED of the ping at 2:30 am and went back out to search in the wee hours thanks to that information. Not that the phone pinged at that time. TIA
SBM/BBMOtherwise, see Indiana Trial Rules posted here yesterday for what must be redacted from filings. IMO and as I recall, it's minors only. No minors in the FM. If Gull, who is in charge of the court record, believes there should be redactions beyond what the IN state statute requires, she's able to to provide specific instructions, and while she wouldn't do that for the Old D,
Mcleland’s 2ND OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS is just one example of where the state itself mentions the victims by their full names. On p. 2,3, & 4 attached below.Interestingly the names of the each victim wasn’t included in RA‘s murder indictment either. The writ involved numerous allegations that rules were not followed….so what of that.
View attachment 461517
A body can drain most all of it's blood in about 5 minutes especially if the right vein is severed and the heart is beating. We only have 4-5 liters of blood. one liter per minute. Not so far fetched katydid23.They weren't there long enough to collect an entire body full of blood. It was daylight, right next to the trails, where people had already begun looking for the missing girls.
No way a ragtag cult of bearded guards was standing by a hanging corpse and draining the blood. That memo is so ridiculous.
Wouldn't someone see that?At night doesn’t mean no light source.
in the standard of review respondent argues that the writ of mandamus is not the appropriate remedy and I agree. These are not meant to be handed out like candy, they should be rare and only granted in a situation where there is no other remedy.Which specific pages/parts do you feel really made good points? TIA
Which phone pinged in the area at 2:30 a.m. after not pinging for hours?<snip>
Reasons this could be plausible:
- phone pinged in the area at 2:30am after not pinging for hours
<snip>
barb macdonald's HLN most recent Delphi special, interviewing first responders.can someone shoot me a link to the phone pinging at 2:30 a.m.?
my understanding is that LE LEARNED of the ping at 2:30 am and went back out to search in the wee hours thanks to that information. Not that the phone pinged at that time. TIA
This is even more implausible than the murder of two (white) girls by Odinists hijacker’s by white supremists due to a parent being involved in an interracial relationship.Wouldn't someone see that?
Sounds risky.
It would be exactly like carrying a gallon of milk. Which is not at all impossible. But perhaps would be noticeable.To add to @susiQ’s response, IMO it would be harder to commit the murders unnoticed than carry around 8lbs of blood unnoticed. A big bag of dog food is 50lbs, 8lbs wouldn’t even weigh as much as 2 5lb dumbbells.
FTR I don’t think the time of death is accurate and believe the murders likely occurred at night, so that would make it easier too. JMO.
Yeah! I just read that in the response. Mea Culpa!SBM/BBM
Except the two MOST important minors in this case.
It would be exactly like carrying a gallon of milk. Which is not at all impossible. But perhaps would be noticeable.
barb macdonald's HLN most recent Delphi special, interviewing first responders.
Yes, first responders learned of the ping at that time, but the ping had very recently happened IIRC.
p. 17,
RESPONDENT'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO RELATOR'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
filed by Gutwein, Stake, & Gull 11/16/2023
bbm
“Relator also seeks to unseal or restore public access to the Franks Memorandum. The Franks Memorandum contains the full first and last names of the deceased minor children who are the crime victims in this case. See, e.g., Record, pp. 57, 70, 106. Names of minor children are required to be redacted from court filings in federal courts. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Indiana, in turn, excludes "Case Records declared confidential or excluded from Public Access pursuant to federal law."
…..Did she just cite federal law to SCION and imply federal law > SCION? That should go over well.
Source:
Then the prosecution is also not following, if correctly applicable….Which in turn shows JG has blatant bias. JMO.Maybe you were skim reading too? It goes on to say ….“Indiana, in turn, excludes "Case Records declared confidential or excluded from Public Access pursuant to federal law."
I agree 100%. Let’s “reel it back.” No one is carrying 2 gallons of blood around. As far as I can remember, it was a flippant comment by an OP. Full stop. Let’s move on. JMHOOkay... but in addition, how LIKELY is this?
Are there Vampires too?
I know this response sounds flippant, but at what point do we reel it back in and use more logic?
JMO