O.Incandenza
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2020
- Messages
- 544
- Reaction score
- 8,378
01/18/2024 | Amended Pleading Filed Information New Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 01/18/2024 |
01/18/2024 | Motion for Leave to Amend Filed Motion for Leave to File Amended Charges.pdf Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 01/18/2024 |
That was always the charge that made more sense to me given the description of events in the AA. I still wonder why they charged it as felony murder at first, but I guess we may never know.DD is saying NMcL filed an ammendment today to upgrade the charges against RA to 1st degree murder.
That's what my mind calculated his, that justice, questions and reactions to have been the outcome...a do over with a hearing into the old D's competency.I understood (thought I heard one of the SCOIN Judges specifically ask that question) that the trial Judge would hold a hearing on their conduct if the ExD are reinstated. I could be mistaken.
MOO
So does this make it more likely for them to seek the death penalty? More bargaining for a plea deal?That was always the charge that made more sense to me given the description of events in the AA. I still wonder why they charged it as felony murder at first, but I guess we may never know.
Wowzers, they filed this right before the hearing.
I think it might be a move for the DP. I really am surprised by the timing of this, but maybe the State is trying to show they feel they have a strong case. IDKSo does this make it more likely for them to seek the death penalty? More bargaining for a plea deal?
IMO death penalty is simply not an option in Indiana at present. Too expensive, too difficult to find drug companies willing to fill a Rx for the necessary drugs, hasn't been a pursued punishment in too long, etc....I think it might be a move for the DP. I really am surprised by the timing of this, but maybe the State is trying to show they feel they have a strong case. IDK
Or to give more leeway for pleading out IMOI think it might be a move for the DP. I really am surprised by the timing of this, but maybe the State is trying to show they feel they have a strong case. IDK
If they are reinstated it sets a horrible precedent. It’s telling defense attorneys they have a green light to ignore court orders, pass sensitive crime scene photos and discovery around at their next family barbecue, and lie to judges.
If the true concern of the justices is to get this trial back on the rails, get rid of both the attorneys and the judge.
My question is how this affects the ex-D, if reinstated, and their alleged plan to file for a speedy trial.I think it might be a move for the DP. I really am surprised by the timing of this, but maybe the State is trying to show they feel they have a strong case. IDK
What I think this does is firmly plant that the DA and LE are stating that RA isn't in any way peripheral to this. How often have I seen it thrown around on here that they charged felony murder because he kidnapped them but they couldn't prove he did the actual killing and there was possibly some shadowy cabal of other perpetrators? This change to the charges places both acts squarely at RA's feet. I think that's important.I think it might be a move for the DP. I really am surprised by the timing of this, but maybe the State is trying to show they feel they have a strong case. IDK
RA's lawyer said they were prepared to file a speedy trial request and be ready to go in 60-70 days. Let's see if they can deliver the check their mouth has written if they get reinstated. The State's Motion said it didn't affect the theory of their case substantially.My question is how this affects the ex-D, if reinstated, and their alleged plan to file for a speedy trial.
If they toss the ExD and Judge G, they would keep the Defense that Judge G appointed I believe. They've been working on the case a couple of months now. If the SCOIN finds cause to remove Judge G, they would have to start with a new Judge. Wow, I'm sorry I keep saying that, but this is one humdinger of a case for sure.What an incredible mess.
If only the exD followed the rules and had never leaked information, we would be ( maybe) witnessing justice unfold.
So,if it All unfolds the way you present, does everything start again from scratch???
LWOP is the only plea RA would get IMOOr to give more leeway for pleading out IMO