Thanks for providing these, so much happening at the same time.
bbm + enlarged by me.
Gutwein kept mentioning Wheat-I’m guessing that is a case from the federal Supreme Court and not SCOIN? Chief Justice Rush said “I haven’t read Wheat.” Or something, IMO implying it’s not applicable. Was it not applicable due to a misconstrued application to this case or bc it wasn’t a SCOIN case?
Guttwein leaned heavily on this case in his oral argument and Chief Justice Rush asked him to cite another authority as she wasn’t convinced of his interpretation.
From my understanding:
drive.google.com
IMO there won’t be a hearing on gross negligence bc there is no gross negligence, as SCOIN also kept asking for evidence of gross negligence today. I’m confident that is why JG didn’t afford the defense due process/hearing re: their alleged gross negligence-it wouldn’t have held up, especially as grounds for their removal as RA’s chosen defense. AJMO.
Rozzi never officially withdrew. Baldwin only “withdrew” under Hobson’s choice duress without due process or a hearing. Even re: Baldwin’s oral withdraw they would need a hearing (due process) and official record of withdrawal. Gull skipped all of that bc she wanted them off the case. JMO.
Ok that's your opinion. We shall see what happens next. Nothing would surprise at this point. Maybe now with the new charges RA will bargain for his life and there will be no trial?
No BR did withdraw. He said so in that filing/protest letter. He said (paraphrasing) he lied to the judge in chambers.
Yep, that's where we're at right now.
I'm not of the opinion that she will, or should, recuse herself. On what grounds?
No, and this is a huge issue for me. Most leaks end up somewhere on the internet, I’ve seen nothing from these leaks. I prefer evidence for things, and so far I’ve seen no evidence of the leaks only regurgitation of these allegations over and over by prosecutor friendly, grifter podcasters. There was also Westerman who allegedly stole the pics (unbeknownst to Baldwin), then distributed them-it wasn’t Baldwin. There should be a chain of custody of all evidence, including evidence to substantiate “gross negligence” per the leaks. If I was a juror, I would ask “Where is the proof Westerman acquired these photos from Baldwin’s office?” Gull has already wiped Westerman records from the record, ironically and conveniently.
Given the guy who bragged about having taken the pictures of the evidence photos did so on his phone, I'm pretty sure the exif data would make proving it easy. And hasn't he been charged? There would have to be enough linking him directly to the pictures for the arrest warrant. Digital investigation by LE would make short work of the trail.
Westerman signed an affidavit that he obtained the photos in question from Baldwin’s office. Are you implying he lied in his affidavit and got them from another source.
fox59.com
(A) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge's impartiality* might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to the following circumstances:
No. I would like to see who all received the photos (per the other ppl mentioned RF, MRC, the woman who sent the photos to RS, allegedly) in what order Westerman sent the photos to who, what order the photos were distributed, and the conversations when sending/exchanging these photos. I also want to know who else Westerman knew besides Baldwin, if anyone, connected to the case. I want to know if an alleged CS photo had a cursor from a mouse on it (suggesting the ss he took was from a computer screen) as RS claims, since the MW affidavit states the picture was of a physical photo. I also want to know why RS (the YouTuber) claims a woman sent him the photos. Who is this woman and who is she connected to?
