SABBMFF:
Interviewer: The sketch, and to be clear, and you did clarify this after, in case folks didn't hear it, you don't want them to look at both sketches anymore. You only want them to look at the newly-released sketch, correct?
DC: That's correct, but remember, the sketch is not a photograph. It's something similar to a resemblance. And the likelihood of this being something between the two, is probably pretty strong. But again, that's a subjective opinion, based on what I believe.
Okay.
LE does not want the public to look at both sketches any more.
Focus on Sketch #2.
Got it.
But DC thinks there's a pretty strong likelihood that BG's appearance is something "between the two sketches."
Got it.
Wait.
Hold up.
Stop this bus, I'm getting off.
The logic is escaping me here.
Why would LE tell the public to disregard Sketch #1 and to focus solely on Sketch #2, if there's a strong likelihood that BG's actual appearance is some kind of amalgamation of 1 and 2 combined?
I really wish the interviewer had clarified what DC meant by "this being something between the two."
What "this" is likely between the two "whats," exactly?
JMO.