OK. Here’s my latest crazy theory. This is about Theory #5 for me, but that’s probably about average for all of us by now I’m thinking. So read it, think on it, pick it apart, point out it’s flaws. I am interested. Just be kind about it.
One thing that I could never understand is why the killer would purposely lead the girls across the creek in mid-February in Indiana. But...I accepted it. Until last fall when I stopped accepting it and decided they all ended up across the creek only because the girls had made a run for it.(see StarryStarryNight crazy theory #4) Anyway. Now the issue became if the killer was not leading them across the creek, where, on the south side of the creek, was he leading them. Maybe that deer shack upstream? Hard to figure. But there is here this scenario.
The killer drives into the long private driveway that goes under the south end of MHB. He doesn’t park it under the bridge but about 50 yards west. Lots of trees there according to the map.( I absolutely do not believe his car is visible in any photo taken of the bridge that day) He is there hoping for an opportunity to kidnap someone. He sees the girls start across the bridge from the north side and as they near the south side he steps onto the bridge and begins to cross in the opposite direction and passes them at some point. He then turns around and walks back toward the south end like the girls. Pictures and videos are taken. As the killer reaches the end of the bridge he tells the girls he is a bridge safety inspector or something and the bridge is unsafe and they cannot cross back over. A conversation ensues on how the girls will get back to trailhead and he says he knows a place to cross. They question it. He says “Guys...you cannot re-cross this unsafe bridge...down the hill”. (This is the gap in the audio clip. LE doesn’t want people to know he presented himself as an authority figure) They all go down the first slope to the private drive where he pulls a gun and tries to walk them to his car. They take off running down toward the creek and cross it. The killer chases and eventually catches them and kills them. He crosses the creek, climbs the hill, gets in his car and is gone.LE is concentrating on the other side of the creek and it’s trailheads etc and the killer was never really over there.
I know there some holes in it. So let me know what you think. In a gentle and friendly way of course.
Hi all,
Been doing my fortnightly thread check but not posted for Months.
I really like some aspects of this SSN ( @#5! ) especially .....
Since the Apr19 Presser and the added Word 'Guys' , Ive toyed with the idea that BG enters the bridge scene initially from the South side,passes the Girls , who happen to be recording their mundane chats about 'things that girls talk about' (BP?AW? Source). This captures his initial, nonchalant, 'Guys' as he passes.
The gap/editing of the recording, if indeed there is a gap/edit, covers the period as BG is seemingly walking away from the girls and maybe captures the girls discussing their unease or the conversation about options to go in a diff direction to avoid further contact ( maybe even taking place after/during when BG has turned around and is heading/hurtling back towards them/the South side?)
This eases my puzzlement as to why BG is not on any earlier pic if he enters the bridge on the North side, or why the girls didnt capture an image of BG earlier.
I worry that the conversation about options of going off the bridge a diff way seemingly makes sense if he indeed approaches them from the N side, they have time to grow concerned/uneasy and have time to hold such a convo....
But....if this was the case that they were concerned enough to chat etc ,then I feel they would be concerned enough to take an earlier pic.
Sorry for the wordy ramble on such a specific point of the theory!